Skip to content

handle secret types #2424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2015
Merged

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented May 21, 2015

Adds support for specifying Secret.Type from the command line and automatic detection based on secret data content.

@derekwaynecarr ptal

@@ -20,9 +20,14 @@ import (
type CreateSecretOptions struct {
// Name of the resulting secret
Name string

// SecretTypeName is the type to use when creating the secret. It is checked against know types.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is checked against known types

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

Fix godoc, lgtm

@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the add-secret-types branch from b7bafd2 to da6a88b Compare May 21, 2015 19:17
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 21, 2015

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_requests_origin/2049/) (Image: devenv-fedora_1593)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin up to da6a88b

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[Test]ing while waiting on the merge queue

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin/2328/)

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2015
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit fe3624d into openshift:master May 22, 2015
@deads2k deads2k deleted the add-secret-types branch June 11, 2015 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants