-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-46474:catalog-operator: Delete Pods that were evicted (#3459) #918
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-46474:catalog-operator: Delete Pods that were evicted (#3459) #918
Conversation
|
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46474, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46474, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
…evicted (#3459) This change adds another reason why a Pod could be detected as "dead", namely when it was evicted by the kubelet. This can happen when there is resource pressure on the Node. Then the reason will be "TerminationByKubelet". This addresses the issue described in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-45490 Signed-off-by: Simon Krenger <skrenger@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 8e39847016ba04a4d12599a8d101f4af77c389b5
484fc52 to
0787bf2
Compare
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
@anik120: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46474, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.17 |
|
@anik120: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Can you point me to the 4.19 PR (main branch PR)? May be it automatically got synced from upstream. |
|
@LalatenduMohanty it did: #907 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, LalatenduMohanty, tmshort The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@anik120: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
6156b61
into
openshift:release-4.18
|
@anik120: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46474: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46474 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@anik120: new pull request created: #922 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-registry |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-operator-framework-tools |
This change adds another reason why a Pod could be detected as "dead", namely when it was evicted by the kubelet. This can happen when there is resource pressure on the Node. Then the reason will be "TerminationByKubelet".
This addresses the issue described in
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-45490
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 8e39847016ba04a4d12599a8d101f4af77c389b5