Skip to content

[RHDEVDOCS-6475] Pipelines 1.17.2 Release Notes #94997

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: pipelines-docs-1.17
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ochromy
Copy link

@ochromy ochromy commented Jun 19, 2025

Version(s):
pipelines-docs-1.17

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 19, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jun 19, 2025

🤖 Thu Jun 19 13:47:01 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://94997--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-pipelines/latest/release_notes/op-release-notes-1-17.html

@ochromy ochromy force-pushed the RHDEVDOCS-6475 branch 4 times, most recently from 7a6427f to 7003909 Compare June 19, 2025 13:17
second rn correction

third rn correction

first fix for OCP versions

add missing dot in first RN

fix last RN formatting

qe review feedback versions
@savitaashture
Copy link

LGTM

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@ochromy: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ochromy
Copy link
Author

ochromy commented Jun 19, 2025

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 19, 2025
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 19, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 19, 2025
@ochromy
Copy link
Author

ochromy commented Jun 20, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 20, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR pipelines and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 20, 2025
[id="release-notes-1-17-2_{context}"]
== Release notes for {pipelines-title} General Availability 1.17.2

With this update, {pipelines-title} General Availability (GA) 1.17.2 is available on {OCP} 4.12, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, and 4.18 versions.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
With this update, {pipelines-title} General Availability (GA) 1.17.2 is available on {OCP} 4.12, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, and 4.18 versions.
With this update, {pipelines-title} General Availability (GA) 1.17.2 is available from {OCP} 4.12 to {OCP} 4.18.

Previous release stated "and later versions" but maybe it should also be more precise?


* Before this update, the `skopeo-copy` task required you to explicitly set the `source_image_url` and `destination_image_url` parameters. This requirement prevented the use of the `images_url` workspace with a `url.txt` file for batch image copying. With this update, both parameters default to empty values and are excluded from strict validation, allowing the task to fall back to the `url.txt` method as intended.

* Before this update, when you used matrixed tasks in a fan-out and fan-in pattern, the `PipelineRun` execution failed with the following error: `invalid result reference in pipeline task 'printer': unable to validate result referencing pipeline task 'platforms': task spec not found`. This issue occurred when a downstream task attempted to reference aggregated results from a matrixed task using the following syntax: `$(tasks.<taskName>.results.<resultName>[*])`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Before this update, when you used matrixed tasks in a fan-out and fan-in pattern, the `PipelineRun` execution failed with the following error: `invalid result reference in pipeline task 'printer': unable to validate result referencing pipeline task 'platforms': task spec not found`. This issue occurred when a downstream task attempted to reference aggregated results from a matrixed task using the following syntax: `$(tasks.<taskName>.results.<resultName>[*])`.
* Before this update, when you used matrixed tasks in a fan-out and fan-in pattern, the `PipelineRun` execution failed with the following error: `invalid result reference in pipeline task 'printer': unable to validate result referencing pipeline task 'platforms': task spec not found`. This issue occurred when a downstream task attempted to reference aggregated results from a matrixed task by using the following syntax: `$(tasks.<taskName>.results.<resultName>[*])`.

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ochromy . Just two minor comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR pipelines size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants