Skip to content

OSDOCS-13196 - Virtual Storage Management - Clarify S3 #92903

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eohartman
Copy link
Contributor

@eohartman eohartman commented May 2, 2025

Version(s):
4.18+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13196

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 2, 2025
@eohartman eohartman force-pushed the osdocs-13196-4 branch 2 times, most recently from 291819b to 24a34ce Compare May 13, 2025 01:44
@eohartman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arendej Can you please take a look at this to see if it's good with what we have discussed?

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 9, 2025

@eohartman: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@eohartman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rafael-azevedo Can you please take a look and let me know if there are any changes you recommend?

Copy link

@rafael-azevedo rafael-azevedo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2025
@eohartman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 20, 2025
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 20, 2025
@lpettyjo lpettyjo self-assigned this Jun 20, 2025
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jun 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants