-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSDOCS#12768: Adding docs for OSSO 1.4.0 #89395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@zhouying7780 Can you please QE review? This is the same known issue and same statement about CVE fixes as we put when there are no other features or changes coming in. For example: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.15/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-release-notes.html#secondary-scheduler-operator-release-notes-1.2.2 Note that the advisory link won't work yet - we won't get this link until the release date, so you can ignore that for now. |
/label peer-review-needed |
|
||
The following advisory is available for the {secondary-scheduler-operator-full} 1.4.0: | ||
|
||
* link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RH??-2025:TODO[RH??-2025:TODO] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this right : [RH??-2025:TODO](https://access.redhat.com/errata/RH??-2025:TODO)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The link to the advisory is not working.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sr1kar99 Links will be available after the operator is shipped. This lgtm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes what @snarayan-redhat said - that link isn't available until the day of the release. We used to at least know what the link would be ahead of time (it just wouldn't work). But now with Konflux, we don't even know what the link will be until it has shipped live. I will update this on the release date once I have that information.
I opened https://issues.redhat.com/browse/KONFLUX-5287 awhile ago to request a way to get that advisory link in advance.
/label peer-review-in-progress |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Adding @snarayan-redhat for another round of review.
|
||
The following advisory is available for the {secondary-scheduler-operator-full} 1.4.0: | ||
|
||
* link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RH??-2025:TODO[RH??-2025:TODO] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The link to the advisory is not working.
@bergerhoffer Added 4.19 label since it's tagged for 4.18+. |
/lgtm |
a8d9e6e
to
225a7c8
Compare
Updated date to show new release date of April 9. |
225a7c8
to
e480c9c
Compare
[id="secondary-scheduler-1.4.0-new-features_{context}"] | ||
=== New features and enhancements | ||
|
||
* This release of the {secondary-scheduler-operator} updates the Kubernetes version to 1.31. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ingvagabund @zhouying7780 I added this line because we had started noting when these operator versions bumped the kube version. Let me know if this looks okay to you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great. Simple and informative.
/lgtm |
LGTM |
e480c9c
to
11ea498
Compare
/lgtm |
11ea498
to
1abf06b
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
1abf06b
to
a818057
Compare
@bergerhoffer: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #93038 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #93039 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Version(s):
4.18+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-12768
Link to docs preview:
https://89395--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-release-notes.html#secondary-scheduler-operator-release-notes-1.4.0_nodes-secondary-scheduler-release-notes
QE review:
Additional information:
Will need to update the advisory link once we get it on the release day - currently scheduled for 9 April.Advisory link is updated - ready to merge once I get the green light that the release is complete