OSSM-8740 Document full list of SMCP CR -> Istio CR fields mapping

[gwynnemonahan]

OSSM 3.0 GA

Merge to: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/tree/service-mesh-docs-main

Cherry pick: to https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/tree/service-mesh-docs-3.0

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSSM-8740

This PR is part of the standalone doc set for the OpenShift Service Mesh project. Kathryn is aware that this content applies for a product that is part of a Technology Preview release. The project is seeking feedback from early adopters.

Version(s):
OSSM 3.0 is moving to stand alone format and will not be cherry-picked back to OCP core branches.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSSM-8740

Link to docs preview:
https://88602--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-service-mesh/latest/migrating/reference/ossm-migrating-reference-assembly.html

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Thu Feb 20 16:06:27 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://88602--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-service-mesh/latest/migrating/reference/ossm-migrating-reference-assembly.html

[jewertow]

I do not understand why fields for 2.6 are not prefixed with spec. like those for 3.0. I would suggest to add spec. prefix to all fields in the column for 2.6, or remove it from 3.0. I prefer the second option.

[FilipB]

I do not understand why fields for 2.6 are not prefixed with spec. like those for 3.0. I would suggest to add spec. prefix to all fields in the column for 2.6, or remove it from 3.0. I prefer the second option.

I assume it was because of Many of the ServiceMeshControlPlane spec. configuration fields in the text. Suggesting that all listed fields belong under spec field. I would vote for first option suggested by Jacek so it's full path. Or go with second option but add a note about all fields belong under spec

[gwynnemonahan]

Hey @FilipB and @jewertow ,

That's now how they are here: https://github.com/openshift-service-mesh/sail-operator/blob/main/docs/ossm/ossm2-migration/smcp-fields-migration/smcp-to-istio-mappings.md#field-mappings-smcp-26-to-istio-30 which is the source of truth so that is how they were copied over.

I can make updates.

[openshift-ci]

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.