Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[enterprise-4.17] Update 4.17 RN tracker tables for Operator Framework #82309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

[enterprise-4.17] Update 4.17 RN tracker tables for Operator Framework #82309

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

adellape
Copy link
Contributor

@adellape adellape commented Sep 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 23, 2024
@adellape adellape force-pushed the 417_of_remdep branch 2 times, most recently from 8c768b4 to 95a6d70 Compare September 23, 2024 22:23
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Sep 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Thu Sep 26 07:06:05 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://82309--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-17-release-notes.html

@adellape adellape added branch/enterprise-4.17 peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Sep 24, 2024
@adellape adellape added this to the Planned for 4.17 GA milestone Sep 24, 2024
@lpettyjo lpettyjo self-requested a review September 24, 2024 19:02
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Sep 24, 2024
lpettyjo
lpettyjo reviewed Sep 24, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lpettyjo lpettyjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Sep 24, 2024
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 26, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 26, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 26, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 26, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2024

@adellape: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@adellape adellape merged commit 4b0f8a6 into openshift:enterprise-4.17 Sep 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@adellape adellape deleted the 417_of_remdep branch September 26, 2024 07:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lpettyjo lpettyjo lpettyjo left review comments

Assignees

@jianzhangbjz jianzhangbjz

Labels
branch/enterprise-4.17 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
OCP 4.17 GA
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@adellape @ocpdocs-previewbot @jianzhangbjz @lpettyjo @openshift-merge-robot