OSDOCS-10959: Fixed a DNS example in the Examples: IP management file

[dfitzmau]

Version(s):
4.13+

Issue:
OSDOCS-10959

Link to docs preview:
DNS

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-10959 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-10959 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.13+

Issue:
OSDOCS-10959

Link to docs preview:

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Wed Jun 26 16:24:02 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://78118--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/k8s_nmstate/k8s-nmstate-updating-node-network-config.html

[openshift-ci]

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-10959 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.13+

Issue:
OSDOCS-10959

Link to docs preview:
DNS

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[cybertron]

/lgtm

[dfitzmau]

/label peer-review-needed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-10959 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.13+

Issue:
OSDOCS-10959

Link to docs preview:
DNS

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-10959 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-10959

Link to docs preview:
DNS

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[bhardesty]

/label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed

[bhardesty]

LGTM!

[bhardesty]

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

[cathay4t]

LGTM

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references OSDOCS-10959 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OSDOCS-10959

Link to docs preview:
DNS

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[dfitzmau]

/label merge-review-needed

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: #78118 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":

Applying: OSDOCS-10959: Fixed a DNS example in the Examples: IP management file
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/virt-example-nmstate-IP-management.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/virt-example-nmstate-IP-management.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/virt-example-nmstate-IP-management.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-10959: Fixed a DNS example in the Examples: IP management file
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #78226

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #78227

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #78228

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #78229

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #78230

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ShaunaDiaz]

Does not need to be picked back to 4.12 per Slack.