Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BZ#085084 - Fix to premigration checklist #45708

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2022

Conversation

RichardHoch
Copy link
Contributor

@RichardHoch RichardHoch commented May 16, 2022

MTC 1.7.1, CP OCP 4.6+

Resolves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085084: It is incorrect to say that all clusters must have the same MTC version in the premigration checklist.

This PR solves the problem by removing the incorrect item from the MTC documentation.

Previews:

  1. https://deploy-preview-45708--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/migrating_from_ocp_3_to_4/premigration-checklists-3-4.html [Premigration checklists for migrating from OCP 3 to 4]
  2. https://deploy-preview-45708--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/migration_toolkit_for_containers/premigration-checklists-mtc.html [Premigration checklists for migrating from OCP 4 to 4]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 16, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 16, 2022

Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 10478e1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/62821205bed86e00082e4011
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-45708--osdocs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link

@stillalearner stillalearner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@GroceryBoyJr GroceryBoyJr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM - stand by for labeling and merge

Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM too, merging

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer merged commit 1d0e649 into openshift:main Jun 2, 2022
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.9

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #46246

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #46247

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #46248

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #46249

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #46250

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #46251

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 branch/enterprise-4.8 branch/enterprise-4.9 branch/enterprise-4.10 branch/enterprise-4.11 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants