Skip to content

Conversation

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743483

Adding the steps to create DNS records to match https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/2221/files#diff-a2ee8aa448a0244512469c9c7126465f\

I think that more work is required to satisfy the bug, but I'm not sure that I have all of the information that is required.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh added this to the Future Release milestone Oct 10, 2019
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh self-assigned this Oct 10, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 10, 2019
@openshift-docs-preview-bot

The preview will be available shortly at:

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This probably needs to go into modules/installation-aws-user-infra-installation.adoc so it can happen after removing bootstrap resources and before wait-for install-complete.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then why's yours after wait-for install-complete?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then why's yours after wait-for install-complete?

Fix in flight openshift/installer#2496 :)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 14, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 14, 2019
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wking, do you see any other changes, or should I pass this to QE?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not mentioned in this doc, for how to obtain <private_hosted_zone_id>

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll add a prereq that says that you've deployed an AWS UPI cluster.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the value of the EXTERNAL-IP address of the Ingress Operator...

may be better to correspond to the description above

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll modify the surrounding text a little, but our style conventions mean that EXTERNAL-IP and <external_ip> need to stay the way they are. (One is referring to the label that people need to check, and the other conforms to our variable format.)

@jianlinliu
Copy link

LGTM.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh changed the title [WIP] bug 1743483 adding DNS record data bug 1743483 adding DNS record data Nov 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 6, 2019
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 6, 2019
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@openshift/team-documentation, PTAL?

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 6, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, Kathryn!

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 6, 2019
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! Merging.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh merged commit 3d8956c into openshift:master Nov 6, 2019
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.2

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kalexand-rh: new pull request created: #17938

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh deleted the BZ1743483 branch November 6, 2019 19:06
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kalexand-rh: new pull request created: #17939

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.2 branch/enterprise-4.3 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants