Skip to content

OSDOCS#16598: Docs for KDO 5.1.4 #102509

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
bergerhoffer merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS#16598: Docs for KDO 5.1.4 #102509

bergerhoffer merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2025

Conversation

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented Nov 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 13, 2025
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added this to the Continuous Release milestone Nov 13, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Wed Dec 03 15:16:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://102509--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/descheduler/nodes-descheduler-release-notes.html

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

bergerhoffer commented Nov 13, 2025

@ingvagabund @zhouying7780 Please review, thanks!

Preview: https://102509--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/descheduler/nodes-descheduler-release-notes.html#descheduler-operator-release-notes-5.1.4

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

ingvagabund commented Nov 13, 2025

LGTM

@zhouying7780
Copy link

zhouying7780 commented Nov 14, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2025
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer marked this pull request as draft December 3, 2025 14:26
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 3, 2025
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

bergerhoffer commented Dec 3, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

FYI advisory link isn't updated yet, just need a merge review of everything else.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Dec 3, 2025
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2025 14:56
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

bergerhoffer commented Dec 3, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

@bergerhoffer: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@lahinson lahinson added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Dec 3, 2025
lahinson
lahinson reviewed Dec 3, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lahinson lahinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for merging

@lahinson lahinson added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Dec 3, 2025
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer merged commit e78f5d1 into openshift:enterprise-4.18 Dec 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor Author

bergerhoffer commented Dec 3, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 3, 2025

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #103388

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 3, 2025

@bergerhoffer: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/openshift-docs#enterprise-4.17 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-102509-to-enterprise-4.17: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-102509-to-enterprise-4.17."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request","status":"422"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lahinson lahinson lahinson left review comments

Assignees

@zhouying7780 zhouying7780

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 ok-to-merge size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Continuous Release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@bergerhoffer @ocpdocs-previewbot @ingvagabund @zhouying7780 @openshift-cherrypick-robot @lahinson