-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 237
OCPBUGS-55217: CombineCABundleConfigMaps: use optimistic create/update #1936
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
vrutkovs
wants to merge
4
commits into
openshift:master
Choose a base branch
from
vrutkovs:combine-cas-optimistic-update
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e6d5f65
Fix order of elements in "Updating annotation" log message
vrutkovs 42666df
crypto: error message should use duration instead of years
vrutkovs b50e914
CombineCABundleConfigMaps: use optimistic create/update
vrutkovs 855d77f
Add unit test for TestCombineCABundleConfigMaps
vrutkovs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit:
Would doing a conversion like
string(certificates[i].Raw)
make it easier to do a==
based comparison?If we were doing simpler equality based comparison of strings you could use a
sets.Set[string]
for tracking duplicates withset.Has(...)
.I think this would reduce it to
O(n)
:Although, you are trading a bit of memory for runtime performance increase this way.
I'll leave it up to you if you'd like to make any changes here, but this isn't something I would block the PR merging on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It also does
[]byte
->string
conversion, so it will use even more memory (and use more allocations). This is not a performance critical code, so I'd rather optimize for memory usage and leave it as is. We may want to do a more comprehensive review of certificate comparison later however