Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-44193: move GCP zone filtering client-side #9169

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

This commit removes GCP server-side filtering when listing zones. GCP imposes a "filtered list cost overhead quota" which limits the amount of server-side filtering we can utilize. More information can be found here:

https://cloud.google.com/compute/api-quota

We have seen CI jobs failing due to:

level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Cluster API Machine Manifests: failed to generate asset "Cluster API Machine Manifests": failed to fetch availability zones: failed to get zones for project: failed to get zones from project XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: googleapi: Error 403: Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Filtered list cost overhead' and limit 'Filtered list cost overhead per minute' of service 'compute.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:711936183532'.

GCP recommends utilizing client-side filters to resolve this: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/api/best-practices#client-side-filter

This commit removes GCP server-side filtering when listing
zones. GCP imposes a "filtered list cost overhead quota" which
limits the amount of server-side filtering we can utilize. More
information can be found here:

https://cloud.google.com/compute/api-quota

We have seen CI jobs failing due to:

level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Cluster API Machine Manifests:
failed to generate asset "Cluster API Machine Manifests": failed
to fetch availability zones: failed to get zones for project:
failed to get zones from project XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: googleapi:
Error 403: Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Filtered list cost overhead'
and limit 'Filtered list cost overhead per minute' of service
'compute.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:711936183532'.

GCP recommends utilizing client-side filters to resolve this:
https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/api/best-practices#client-side-filter
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 4, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickdillon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44193, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This commit removes GCP server-side filtering when listing zones. GCP imposes a "filtered list cost overhead quota" which limits the amount of server-side filtering we can utilize. More information can be found here:

https://cloud.google.com/compute/api-quota

We have seen CI jobs failing due to:

level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Cluster API Machine Manifests: failed to generate asset "Cluster API Machine Manifests": failed to fetch availability zones: failed to get zones for project: failed to get zones from project XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: googleapi: Error 403: Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Filtered list cost overhead' and limit 'Filtered list cost overhead per minute' of service 'compute.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:711936183532'.

GCP recommends utilizing client-side filters to resolve this: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/api/best-practices#client-side-filter

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @r4f4 @barbacbd

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from barbacbd and r4f4 November 4, 2024 16:21
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 4, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickdillon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44193, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from patrickdillon. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2024

@patrickdillon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants