Skip to content

Conversation

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

This PR is based on #1872 (changes in enhancements/kube-apiserver/kms-encryption-foundations.md).

There are many aspects that need to be implemented to support KMS in OpenShift. We have decided to open more granular EPs to better track the work.

This EPs main aim is to focus on the encryption controller changes in library-go. This EP defers some concepts to future in order to start with simpler, manageable iterations.

PoC PR openshift/library-go#2045 (this is just a PoC, original PR will be opened when this EP merges).

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 3, 2025

@ardaguclu: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-2120 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This PR is based on #1872 (changes in enhancements/kube-apiserver/kms-encryption-foundations.md).

There are many aspects that need to be implemented to support KMS in OpenShift. We have decided to open more granular EPs to better track the work.

This EPs main aim is to focus on the encryption controller changes in library-go. This EP defers some concepts to future in order to start with simpler, manageable iterations.

PoC PR openshift/library-go#2045 (this is just a PoC, original PR will be opened when this EP merges).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from hasbro17 and yuqi-zhang December 3, 2025 09:35
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jaypoulz for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ardaguclu ardaguclu force-pushed the kms-encryption-controllers branch from c091cbc to f734b05 Compare December 3, 2025 09:43
Copy link
Member

@flavianmissi flavianmissi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have to take a short break from reviewing, but leaving the comments I got so far.

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @ibihim @flavianmissi

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from flavianmissi and ibihim December 3, 2025 14:08
@ardaguclu ardaguclu force-pushed the kms-encryption-controllers branch 2 times, most recently from 1794054 to 1ddc3d8 Compare December 4, 2025 07:19
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member Author

@flavianmissi I was uncomfortable about the disconnects between the sections and the verbosity. So I overhauled the EP to have better clarity. Please let me know your thoughts.

@ardaguclu ardaguclu force-pushed the kms-encryption-controllers branch 3 times, most recently from e920a9c to 5804b76 Compare December 4, 2025 08:35
@ardaguclu ardaguclu force-pushed the kms-encryption-controllers branch from f39a0d7 to 8f79ed6 Compare December 5, 2025 04:21
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@ardaguclu: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@flavianmissi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2025
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @benluddy

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from benluddy December 5, 2025 13:00
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member Author

As we agreed with @flavianmissi, in next iterations there will be another condition to notify users to delete unused kms plugins from cluster, when prune_controller prunes them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants