Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-37101: Remove logoutOpenShift method call #14658

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jhadvig
Copy link
Member

@jhadvig jhadvig commented Jan 6, 2025

The logoutOpenShift got remove part of the External OIDC work.
/assign @TheRealJon

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels Jan 6, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37101, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 6, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from spadgett and TheRealJon January 6, 2025 11:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added component/core Related to console core functionality approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 6, 2025
@jhadvig jhadvig force-pushed the OCPBUGS-37101 branch 2 times, most recently from 6b2ef6a to a42a1ed Compare January 7, 2025 11:03
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/backend Related to backend label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are changes in this file a part of this bug fix? Seems unrelated.

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Jan 27, 2025

@TheRealJon thanks for review, addressing your comment.

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Feb 11, 2025

/retest

1 similar comment
@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Feb 12, 2025

/retest

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Feb 12, 2025

/jira refresh
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Feb 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37101, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from yapei February 12, 2025 14:13
@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Feb 12, 2025

/cherry-pick release-4.18

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jhadvig: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.18 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@TheRealJon TheRealJon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, TheRealJon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e0ec6b5 and 2 for PR HEAD 4984059 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fd129e6 and 1 for PR HEAD 4984059 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 12fa88b and 0 for PR HEAD 4984059 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 4984059 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 15, 2025
@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Feb 24, 2025

/retest

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Feb 25, 2025

Looks like the knative integration test is failing

 ✖  knative-ci.feature   

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@jhadvig: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37101, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

In response to this:

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/backend Related to backend component/core Related to console core functionality do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants