Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-43834: Enabling topology e2e tests on CI #14438

Conversation

sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor

@sanketpathak sanketpathak commented Oct 25, 2024

CI is stable in 4.17 with no topology-ci.feature file issue
Screenshot from 2024-10-25 16-26-39

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added component/topology Related to topology approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 25, 2024
@sanketpathak sanketpathak changed the title Enabling topology e2e tests on CI OCPBUGS-43834: Enabling topology e2e tests on CI Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanketpathak: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-console

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 29, 2024

@sanketpathak: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@The-Anton
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sanketpathak, The-Anton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@lokanandaprabhu
Copy link
Contributor

/backport-risk-assessed

@lokanandaprabhu
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2024

@lokanandaprabhu: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: []

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@invincibleJai
Copy link
Member

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Nov 5, 2024
@The-Anton
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 6, 2024
@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanketpathak: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanketpathak: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.16." or "openshift-4.16.", but it targets "4.15.z" instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39573 to target a version in 4.17.0, 4.17.z, but it targets "4.15.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 7, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanketpathak: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39573 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39573 targets the "4.17.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0, 4.17.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sanketpathak

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 7, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: sanketpathak.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@sanketpathak: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39573 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39573 targets the "4.17.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0, 4.17.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sanketpathak

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 95cf5fd into openshift:release-4.16 Nov 7, 2024
6 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanketpathak: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43834 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

CI is stable in 4.17 with no topology-ci.feature file issue
Screenshot from 2024-10-25 16-26-39

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-console
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-console-container-v4.16.0-202411070938.p0.g95cf5fd.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-11-07-112601

@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick 4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sanketpathak: cannot checkout 4.15: error checking out "4.15": exit status 1 error: pathspec '4.15' did not match any file(s) known to git

In response to this:

/cherry-pick 4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sanketpathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sanketpathak: new pull request created: #14567

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. component/topology Related to topology jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.