Skip to content

TRT-2048: Revert "OCPCLOUD-2792: corecluster: set controller level conditions + tests"#273

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
xueqzhan:revert-256-corecluster-controller-level-status-report
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

TRT-2048: Revert "OCPCLOUD-2792: corecluster: set controller level conditions + tests"#273
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
xueqzhan:revert-256-corecluster-controller-level-status-report

Conversation

@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor

@xueqzhan xueqzhan commented Mar 18, 2025

Reverts #256; tracked by https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-52848

Per OpenShift policy, we are reverting this breaking change to get CI and/or nightly payloads flowing again.

This PR has caused samples operator to fail during installation starting from this payload: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/release/4.19/tags/4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-03-05-232901/pull_requests

Slack thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1741634385702679

To unrevert this, revert this PR, and layer an additional separate commit on top that addresses the problem. Before merging the unrevert, please run these jobs on the PR and check the result of (job/X or job/X, test/Y tuple) to confirm the fix has corrected the problem:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

CC: @damdo

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2792 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #256

/hold

Please ignore. We are testing a payload failure with this

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 18, 2025
@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/1dea9e10-0408-11f0-9b11-9b1da6f50cfe-0

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and nrb March 18, 2025 14:51
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign radekmanak for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f1e28ac0-0417-11f0-8678-c154cd968546-0

@xueqzhan xueqzhan changed the title Revert "OCPCLOUD-2792: corecluster: set controller level conditions + tests" TRT-2048: Revert "OCPCLOUD-2792: corecluster: set controller level conditions + tests" Mar 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: This pull request references TRT-2048 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #256

/hold

Please ignore. We are testing a payload failure with this

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: This pull request references TRT-2048 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #256; tracked by

Per OpenShift policy, we are reverting this breaking change to get CI and/or nightly payloads flowing again.

This PR has caused samples operator to fail during installation starting from this payload: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/release/4.19/tags/4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-03-05-232901/pull_requests

Slack thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1741634385702679

To unrevert this, revert this PR, and layer an additional separate commit on top that addresses the problem. Before merging the unrevert, please run these jobs on the PR and check the result of (job/X or job/X, test/Y tuple) to confirm the fix has corrected the problem:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

CC: , ,

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: This pull request references TRT-2048 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #256; tracked by

Per OpenShift policy, we are reverting this breaking change to get CI and/or nightly payloads flowing again.

This PR has caused samples operator to fail during installation starting from this payload: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/release/4.19/tags/4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-03-05-232901/pull_requests

Slack thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1741634385702679

To unrevert this, revert this PR, and layer an additional separate commit on top that addresses the problem. Before merging the unrevert, please run these jobs on the PR and check the result of (job/X or job/X, test/Y tuple) to confirm the fix has corrected the problem:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

CC: damdo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: This pull request references TRT-2048 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #256; tracked by

Per OpenShift policy, we are reverting this breaking change to get CI and/or nightly payloads flowing again.

This PR has caused samples operator to fail during installation starting from this payload: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/release/4.19/tags/4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-03-05-232901/pull_requests

Slack thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1741634385702679

To unrevert this, revert this PR, and layer an additional separate commit on top that addresses the problem. Before merging the unrevert, please run these jobs on the PR and check the result of (job/X or job/X, test/Y tuple) to confirm the fix has corrected the problem:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

CC: @damdo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: This pull request references TRT-2048 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #256; tracked by https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-52848

Per OpenShift policy, we are reverting this breaking change to get CI and/or nightly payloads flowing again.

This PR has caused samples operator to fail during installation starting from this payload: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/release/4.19/tags/4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-03-05-232901/pull_requests

Slack thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1741634385702679

To unrevert this, revert this PR, and layer an additional separate commit on top that addresses the problem. Before merging the unrevert, please run these jobs on the PR and check the result of (job/X or job/X, test/Y tuple) to confirm the fix has corrected the problem:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial

CC: @damdo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label lgtm
/label approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: The label(s) /label lgtm cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label lgtm
/label approved

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2025

@xueqzhan: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 19, 2025
@sosiouxme
Copy link
Member

/retest

@sosiouxme
Copy link
Member

... although given it takes 3+ hours to run i imagine you want to override

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@xueqzhan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/regression-clusterinfra-cucushift-rehearse-capi-aws-ipi 3519eb0 link false /test regression-clusterinfra-cucushift-rehearse-capi-aws-ipi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@xueqzhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 19, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c5a5e4e into openshift:main Mar 19, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants