Skip to content

Conversation

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

@bertinatto bertinatto commented Oct 22, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 22, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 22, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2024

@bertinatto: This pull request references API-1835 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ibihim and liouk October 22, 2024 18:23
@bertinatto bertinatto changed the title [WIP] API-1835: Try apply multiple controllers [WIP] API-1835: Bump library-go to get SSA in multiple controllers Oct 22, 2024
@bertinatto bertinatto force-pushed the try-apply-multiple-controllers branch 3 times, most recently from d28bf43 to adaa805 Compare October 23, 2024 14:04
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-vsphere-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 23, 2024

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-vsphere-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/ad0f2b20-9148-11ef-9590-4792b3fe2ec2-0

@bertinatto bertinatto force-pushed the try-apply-multiple-controllers branch from adaa805 to bdbbca9 Compare October 24, 2024 14:55
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-vsphere-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 24, 2024

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-vsphere-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/551e7780-9225-11ef-9c13-c4fec185a20f-0

@bertinatto bertinatto force-pushed the try-apply-multiple-controllers branch 2 times, most recently from 9f5bd70 to 20a1ad6 Compare October 25, 2024 17:09
@bertinatto bertinatto changed the title [WIP] API-1835: Bump library-go to get SSA in multiple controllers API-1835: Bump library-go to get SSA in multiple controllers Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 25, 2024

@bertinatto: This pull request references API-1835 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

/assign @deads2k @p0lyn0mial

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 25, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-operator
/lgtm

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 25, 2024

@deads2k: Overrode contexts on behalf of deads2k: ci/prow/e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-operator
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 25, 2024
ret.ControllerRunOnceFns = append(ret.ControllerRunOnceFns, libraryapplyconfiguration.AdaptSyncFn(authOperatorInput.eventRecorder, resourceSyncer.Sync))

configOverridesController := unsupportedconfigoverridescontroller.NewUnsupportedConfigOverridesController(authOperatorInput.authenticationOperatorClient, authOperatorInput.eventRecorder)
configOverridesController := unsupportedconfigoverridescontroller.NewUnsupportedConfigOverridesController("openshift-auhentication", authOperatorInput.authenticationOperatorClient, authOperatorInput.eventRecorder)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you're rebasing anyway, fix the typo in authentication.

@bertinatto bertinatto force-pushed the try-apply-multiple-controllers branch from 20a1ad6 to bc38d8d Compare October 25, 2024 19:48
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 25, 2024
@bertinatto bertinatto force-pushed the try-apply-multiple-controllers branch from bc38d8d to 9689315 Compare October 25, 2024 19:53
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 25, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, deads2k

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

8 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 28, 2024

@bertinatto: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node 9689315 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62812dc and 2 for PR HEAD 9689315 in total

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 28, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 28, 2024

@deads2k: Overrode contexts on behalf of deads2k: ci/prow/e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fa0aa49 into openshift:master Oct 28, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants