Skip to content

Rename autoperibolossync to auto-peribolos-sync#4919

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
psalajova:rename-autoperibolossync
Feb 3, 2026
Merged

Rename autoperibolossync to auto-peribolos-sync#4919
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
psalajova:rename-autoperibolossync

Conversation

@psalajova
Copy link
Contributor

ci-operator builds this image with a different name, resulting in the image not being rebuilt even if the relevant code was changed, same as #4905

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Walkthrough

This pull request updates naming conventions across documentation and container configuration, replacing references to "autoperibolossync" with "auto-peribolos-sync" in textual identifiers, binary names, and command directives without altering functional behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
cmd/auto-peribolos-sync/README.md
Renames product references from autoperibolossync to auto-peribolos-sync in headers, descriptions, code literals, and job references throughout the document.
Container Configuration
images/auto-peribolos-sync/Dockerfile
Updates binary name from autoperibolossync to auto-peribolos-sync in ADD directive and ENTRYPOINT command.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

🧪 Unit Test Generation v2 is now available!

We have significantly improved our unit test generation capabilities.

To enable: Add this to your .coderabbit.yaml configuration:

reviews:
  finishing_touches:
    unit_tests:
      enabled: true

Try it out by using the @coderabbitai generate unit tests command on your code files or under ✨ Finishing Touches on the walkthrough!

Have feedback? Share your thoughts on our Discord thread!


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jmguzik and smg247 January 30, 2026 15:22
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 30, 2026
@droslean
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: droslean, psalajova

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 58c7b9e and 2 for PR HEAD b6d2fe3 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 6ff431c and 1 for PR HEAD b6d2fe3 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e728693 and 0 for PR HEAD b6d2fe3 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision b6d2fe3 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 31, 2026
@psalajova
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2026
@psalajova
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test images

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e728693 and 2 for PR HEAD b6d2fe3 in total

@psalajova
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/images

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@psalajova: Overrode contexts on behalf of psalajova: ci/prow/images

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@droslean
Copy link
Member

droslean commented Feb 2, 2026

/test images

@droslean
Copy link
Member

droslean commented Feb 2, 2026

The images job failure is legit and it should be resolved after openshift/release#74190. We need to ensure the changes in openshift/release#74190 are correct as well.

@psalajova
Copy link
Contributor Author

The images job failure is legit and it should be resolved after openshift/release#74190. We need to ensure the changes in openshift/release#74190 are correct as well.

Ah, sorry, I thought it was the other way around

@droslean
Copy link
Member

droslean commented Feb 2, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@droslean: Overrode contexts on behalf of droslean: ci/prow/e2e

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@droslean
Copy link
Member

droslean commented Feb 2, 2026

The images job failure is legit and it should be resolved after openshift/release#74190. We need to ensure the changes in openshift/release#74190 are correct as well.

Ah, sorry, I thought it was the other way around

Yea its confusing. The job passed, we can merge the PR. I overrode the e2e since its not related to the changes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b751022 and 1 for PR HEAD b6d2fe3 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@psalajova: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/breaking-changes b6d2fe3 link false /test breaking-changes

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c919d87 and 0 for PR HEAD b6d2fe3 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 9820d39 into openshift:main Feb 3, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants