Rename autoperibolossync to auto-peribolos-sync#4919
Rename autoperibolossync to auto-peribolos-sync#4919openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
WalkthroughThis pull request updates naming conventions across documentation and container configuration, replacing references to "autoperibolossync" with "auto-peribolos-sync" in textual identifiers, binary names, and command directives without altering functional behavior. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 🧪 Unit Test Generation v2 is now available!We have significantly improved our unit test generation capabilities. To enable: Add this to your reviews:
finishing_touches:
unit_tests:
enabled: trueTry it out by using the Have feedback? Share your thoughts on our Discord thread! Comment |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: droslean, psalajova The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/hold Revision b6d2fe3 was retested 3 times: holding |
|
/unhold |
|
/test images |
|
/override ci/prow/images |
|
@psalajova: Overrode contexts on behalf of psalajova: ci/prow/images DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/test images |
|
The images job failure is legit and it should be resolved after openshift/release#74190. We need to ensure the changes in openshift/release#74190 are correct as well. |
Ah, sorry, I thought it was the other way around |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e |
|
@droslean: Overrode contexts on behalf of droslean: ci/prow/e2e DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Yea its confusing. The job passed, we can merge the PR. I overrode the e2e since its not related to the changes. |
|
@psalajova: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
9820d39
into
openshift:main
ci-operator builds this image with a different name, resulting in the image not being rebuilt even if the relevant code was changed, same as #4905