[release-ocm-2.13] MGMT-20066: Remove 4.19 pre-release os images

[carbonin]

These shouldn't be present in the release branch

Resolves https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MGMT-20066

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

[openshift-ci-robot]

@carbonin: This pull request references MGMT-20066 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

These shouldn't be present in the release branch

Resolves https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MGMT-20066

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: carbonin, gamli75

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [carbonin,gamli75]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.96%. Comparing base (199c5f1) to head (d384636).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release-ocm-2.13.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           release-ocm-2.13    #7356      +/-   ##
====================================================
- Coverage             67.97%   67.96%   -0.01%     
====================================================
  Files                   300      300              
  Lines                 41007    41007              
====================================================
- Hits                  27874    27871       -3     
- Misses                10631    10633       +2     
- Partials               2502     2503       +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[carbonin]

What about this did konflux not like?

@pastequo ?

[openshift-ci]

@carbonin: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[carbonin]

/retest

[pastequo]

/retest

[pastequo]

/retest

[giladravid16]

/retest

[giladravid16]

/retest

[giladravid16]

/retest