-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 524
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1992592: Atomic List Type #1028
Bug 1992592: Atomic List Type #1028
Conversation
b773eae
to
437a72a
Compare
config/v1/types_oauth.go
Outdated
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ type OAuthSpec struct { | |||
// identityProviders is an ordered list of ways for a user to identify themselves. | |||
// When this list is empty, no identities are provisioned for users. | |||
// +optional | |||
// listType=atomic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a tag, so it should be // +listType=atomic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ty!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I totally miss a discussion why atomic is correct here. I doubt it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Making list atomic to prevent GitOps overwrite" – atomic enforces exactly that: overwrite.
/retitle Bug 1992592: Atomic List Type |
@EmilyM1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1992592, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
73bb042
to
f0f9f74
Compare
f83da6b
to
4ce104f
Compare
/bugzilla refresh |
@EmilyM1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1992592, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@EmilyM1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1992592, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (liyao@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: EmilyM1, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@EmilyM1: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1992592 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.9 |
@EmilyM1: new pull request created: #1036 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.8 |
@EmilyM1: #1028 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.8":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.8 |
@EmilyM1: #1028 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.8":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.8 |
@EmilyM1: #1028 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.8":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is a cherry-pick of openshift#1028 (c7f90e1)
Making list atomic to prevent GitOps overwrite