Skip to content

Conversation

@shajmakh
Copy link
Member

Add new workflow to build and release binary for tools/hugepages-machineconfig-generator to enable using it externally.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from Tal-or and ffromani July 21, 2022 11:36
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 21, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2579

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 60.463%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2565: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1644
Relevant Lines: 2719

💛 - Coveralls

@shajmakh
Copy link
Member Author

need to add a new tag from master to enable this workflow to run correctly and provide releases with the tool binary.

Copy link
Member

@ffromani ffromani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice work. I'm in favour of adding GH actions support for this repo (which is in maintenance mode anyway) and for this purpose.
Let's just fix the possible release name clash (see inline comment) and let's get consensus with other devs.

- name: release the tool binary
uses: ncipollo/release-action@v1
with:
name: hugepagesmcgenartor
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove the explicit name? this way the release name should be the same as the tag name - which is a bit better. Right?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correct! will modify it, thanks!

Add new workflow to build and release binary for tools/hugepages-machineconfig-generator to enable using it externally.
Copy link
Member

@ffromani ffromani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold
adding gh actions is a good thing in general, and so is having the PAO tools easily available.
We expect to make few runs in general and in this repo in particular - being on maintenance mode
Low risk, high gain.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 21, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2022
@shajmakh
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@ffromani
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

it is good to have a full green run, but for this specific PR we can safely override failing lines. Adding github actions config can't possibly break any production flow (or test code)

@shajmakh
Copy link
Member Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2022

@shajmakh: shajmakh unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:.

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ffromani
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-upgrade /override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

don't worry, I can override once we reach consensus :) we only need more LGTMs

@swatisehgal
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@ffromani
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2022

@fromanirh: Overrode contexts on behalf of fromanirh: ci/prow/e2e-gcp, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ffromani
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fromanirh, shajmakh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 22, 2022
@ffromani
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 22, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 35e46a1 into openshift-kni:master Jul 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants