Skip to content

Conversation

@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Backport c05a58c from #3867.

* Implement reverse

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Add reverse integ tests and unit tests

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Add reverse documentation

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Modify reverse test and documentation

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Fix limit pushdown bug when reverse comes before head

* Revert "Fix limit pushdown bug when reverse comes before head"

This reverts commit 087c936.

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Fix grammar, naming, and test cases. Pushdown reverted will be in 2nd PR.

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Fix reverse tests: update logical plans, format with Spotless

- Updated expected logical plans and Spark SQL in reverse tests
- Applied Spotless to fix formatting

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Fix OS version in build 3.1.0

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Add note on limitation to rst

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Move explain IT to correct file, add Anonymizer test

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

* Add reverse to index.rst

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Selina Song <selsong@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit c05a58c)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@dai-chen dai-chen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you double check the CI failure?

@dai-chen
Copy link
Collaborator

dai-chen commented Aug 6, 2025

Retrying CI:

2025-08-06T17:36:43.0076460Z Tests with failures:
2025-08-06T17:36:43.0154820Z  - org.opensearch.sql.calcite.tpch.CalcitePPLTpchIT.testQ7

@Swiddis Swiddis merged commit c12ed27 into 2.19-dev Aug 7, 2025
73 of 76 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants