Skip to content

Conversation

@LantaoJin
Copy link
Member

@LantaoJin LantaoJin commented Feb 17, 2025

Description

Fix imports related to split package of org.opensearch.transport

Related to opensearch-project/OpenSearch#17272

Related Issues

Resolves #3324

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added.
  • New functionality has a user manual doc added.
  • API changes companion pull request created.
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Lantao Jin <ltjin@amazon.com>
@LantaoJin
Copy link
Member Author

This two classes continue fail in compiling until related repositories upgraded.
https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial

opensearch/src/main/java/org/opensearch/sql/opensearch/planner/physical/OpenSearchEvalProcessor.java:53: error: cannot access NodeClient
    IpEnrichmentActionClient ipClient = new IpEnrichmentActionClient(nodeClient);

https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons

opensearch/src/main/java/org/opensearch/sql/opensearch/client/MLClient.java:19: error: cannot access Client
      INSTANCE = new MachineLearningNodeClient(nodeClient);

cc @peterzhuamazon

@LantaoJin
Copy link
Member Author

Regarding to the CI logs of another PR. I found the OpenSearch artifact we download is version[3.0.0-SNAPSHOT], pid[1758], build[tar/a3717aebc7553ca8dbb96f4b3e0961ced5913113/2025-01-23T21:30:01.685571287Z]. The upstream changes introduced after 2025-02-07, not sure why the CI workflow haven't update its artifact. Node cache?

@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is stalled because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

Close as main is already having above changes.

cc: @noCharger

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Upstream Client dependency package moved

2 participants