Skip to content

Conversation

@kkewwei
Copy link
Contributor

@kkewwei kkewwei commented Mar 6, 2025

Description

Related Issues

Resolves #17531

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 2a17f65: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@kkewwei kkewwei force-pushed the fix_loop_in_updateRep branch from 2a17f65 to 0a9da2d Compare March 6, 2025 16:05
@kkewwei kkewwei reopened this Apr 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from ✅ Done to 🏗 In progress in Storage Project Board Apr 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 6ebee6d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@kkewwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

kkewwei commented Apr 17, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 6ebee6d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

MinimumClusterManagerNodesIT.testThreeNodesNoClusterManagerBlock #14289
DedicatedClusterSnapshotRestoreIT.testSnapshotWithStuckNode #15806
SimpleSearchIT.testSimpleTerminateAfterTrackTotalHitsUpToSize #16851

@kkewwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

kkewwei commented Apr 17, 2025

@andrross @ashking94 I'm very sorry to mention you again. Could someone help continue to review or merge the PR? There are too many flaky tests and Gradle check always fails.

Your help is greatly appreciated. I want to continue #17488, but was blocked by this PR.

@andrross
Copy link
Member

@andrross @ashking94 I'm very sorry to mention you again. Could someone help continue to review or merge the PR? There are too many flaky tests and Gradle check always fails.

Your help is greatly appreciated. I want to continue #17488, but was blocked by this PR.

Thanks for sticking with this @kkewwei. A lot of us are busy with the 3.0 release and as you've noted flaky tests are a major problem at the moment.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 6ebee6d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Storage Project Board Apr 21, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 6ebee6d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 6ebee6d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kewei.11@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kkewwei@163.com>
@andrross andrross force-pushed the fix_loop_in_updateRep branch from 6ebee6d to 7415b92 Compare April 21, 2025 23:10
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 7415b92: SUCCESS

@andrross andrross merged commit f122c46 into opensearch-project:main Apr 22, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Storage Project Board Apr 22, 2025
x-INFiN1TY-x pushed a commit to x-INFiN1TY-x/OpenSearch_Local that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2025
…ject#17532)

Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kewei.11@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kkewwei@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanishq Ranjan <tqranjan@amazon.com>
Harsh-87 pushed a commit to Harsh-87/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
…ject#17532)

Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kewei.11@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kkewwei@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Kothari <techarsh@amazon.com>
Harsh-87 pushed a commit to Harsh-87/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
…ject#17532)

Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kewei.11@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: kkewwei <kkewwei@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Kothari <techarsh@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working Storage:Snapshots

Projects

Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Simultaneously creating a snapshot and updating the repository can potentially trigger an infinite loop to snapshot creation

4 participants