Fix tests and test skaffolding

Signed-off-by: Andriy Redko <andriy.redko@aiven.io>
opensearch-project · Nov 10, 2023 · cef267e · cef267e
1 parent 4a56213
commit cef267e
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 5 changed files with 39 additions and 19 deletions.
diff --git a/server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/opensearch/discovery/ClusterManagerDisruptionIT.java b/server/src/internalClusterTest/java/org/opensearch/discovery/ClusterManagerDisruptionIT.java
@@ -58,7 +58,9 @@
 
 import static org.opensearch.test.hamcrest.OpenSearchAssertions.assertAcked;
 import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.lessThan;
 import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.not;
+import static org.junit.Assume.assumeThat;
 
 /**
  * Tests relating to the loss of the cluster-manager.
@@ -71,6 +73,7 @@ public class ClusterManagerDisruptionIT extends AbstractDisruptionTestCase {
      */
     public void testClusterManagerNodeGCs() throws Exception {
         List<String> nodes = startCluster(3);
+        assumeThat("Thread::resume / Thread::suspend are not supported anymore", Runtime.version(), lessThan(Runtime.Version.parse("20")));
 
         String oldClusterManagerNode = internalCluster().getClusterManagerName();
         // a very long GC, but it's OK as we remove the disruption when it has had an effect

diff --git a/...c/internalClusterTest/java/org/opensearch/discovery/StableClusterManagerDisruptionIT.java b/...c/internalClusterTest/java/org/opensearch/discovery/StableClusterManagerDisruptionIT.java
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@
 
 import static java.util.Collections.singleton;
 import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.lessThan;
+import static org.junit.Assume.assumeThat;
 
 /**
  * Tests relating to the loss of the cluster-manager, but which work with the default fault detection settings which are rather lenient and will
@@ -195,6 +197,8 @@ private void testFollowerCheckerAfterClusterManagerReelection(NetworkLinkDisrupt
      * following another elected cluster-manager node. These nodes should reject this cluster state and prevent them from following the stale cluster-manager.
      */
     public void testStaleClusterManagerNotHijackingMajority() throws Exception {
+        assumeThat("Thread::resume / Thread::suspend are not supported anymore", Runtime.version(), lessThan(Runtime.Version.parse("20")));
+
         final List<String> nodes = internalCluster().startNodes(
             3,
             Settings.builder()

diff --git a/server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/common/util/concurrent/BaseFuture.java b/server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/common/util/concurrent/BaseFuture.java
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ public abstract class BaseFuture<V> implements Future<V> {
      *
      * @throws InterruptedException  if the current thread was interrupted before
      *                               or during the call (optional but recommended).
-     * @throws CancellationException {@inheritDoc}
+     * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
      */
     @Override
     public V get(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException, ExecutionException {
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ public V get(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException, TimeoutEx
      *
      * @throws InterruptedException  if the current thread was interrupted before
      *                               or during the call (optional but recommended).
-     * @throws CancellationException {@inheritDoc}
+     * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
      */
     @Override
     public V get() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

diff --git a/...ork/src/main/java/org/opensearch/cluster/coordination/MockSinglePrioritizingExecutor.java b/...ork/src/main/java/org/opensearch/cluster/coordination/MockSinglePrioritizingExecutor.java
@@ -44,25 +44,30 @@
 public class MockSinglePrioritizingExecutor extends PrioritizedOpenSearchThreadPoolExecutor {
 
     public MockSinglePrioritizingExecutor(String name, DeterministicTaskQueue deterministicTaskQueue, ThreadPool threadPool) {
-        super(name, 0, 1, 0L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, r -> new Thread() {
-            @Override
-            public void start() {
-                deterministicTaskQueue.scheduleNow(new Runnable() {
-                    @Override
-                    public void run() {
-                        try {
-                            r.run();
-                        } catch (KillWorkerError kwe) {
-                            // hacks everywhere
-                        }
+        super(name, 0, 1, 0L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, r -> {
+            // This executor used to override Thread::start method so the actual runnable is
+            // being scheduled in the scope of current thread of execution. In JDK-19, the Thread::start
+            // is not called anymore (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292027) and there is no
+            // suitable option to alter the executor's behavior in the similar way. The closest we
+            // could get to is to schedule the runnable once the ThreadFactory is being asked to
+            // allocate the new thread.
+            deterministicTaskQueue.scheduleNow(new Runnable() {
+                @Override
+                public void run() {
+                    try {
+                        r.run();
+                    } catch (KillWorkerError kwe) {
+                        // hacks everywhere
                     }
+                }
 
-                    @Override
-                    public String toString() {
-                        return r.toString();
-                    }
-                });
-            }
+                @Override
+                public String toString() {
+                    return r.toString();
+                }
+            });
+
+            return new Thread(() -> {});
         }, threadPool.getThreadContext(), threadPool.scheduler());
     }
 

diff --git a/test/framework/src/test/java/org/opensearch/test/disruption/LongGCDisruptionTests.java b/test/framework/src/test/java/org/opensearch/test/disruption/LongGCDisruptionTests.java
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
 import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.containsString;
 import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
 import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.greaterThan;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.lessThan;
+import static org.junit.Assume.assumeThat;
 
 public class LongGCDisruptionTests extends OpenSearchTestCase {
 
@@ -65,6 +67,8 @@ public void executeLocked(Runnable r) {
     }
 
     public void testBlockingTimeout() throws Exception {
+        assumeThat("Thread::resume / Thread::suspend are not supported anymore", Runtime.version(), lessThan(Runtime.Version.parse("20")));
+
         final String nodeName = "test_node";
         LongGCDisruption disruption = new LongGCDisruption(random(), nodeName) {
             @Override
@@ -125,6 +129,8 @@ protected long getSuspendingTimeoutInMillis() {
      * but does keep retrying until all threads can be safely paused
      */
     public void testNotBlockingUnsafeStackTraces() throws Exception {
+        assumeThat("Thread::resume / Thread::suspend are not supported anymore", Runtime.version(), lessThan(Runtime.Version.parse("20")));
+
         final String nodeName = "test_node";
         LongGCDisruption disruption = new LongGCDisruption(random(), nodeName) {
             @Override
@@ -179,6 +185,8 @@ protected Pattern[] getUnsafeClasses() {
     }
 
     public void testBlockDetection() throws Exception {
+        assumeThat("Thread::resume / Thread::suspend are not supported anymore", Runtime.version(), lessThan(Runtime.Version.parse("20")));
+
         final String disruptedNodeName = "disrupted_node";
         final String blockedNodeName = "blocked_node";
         CountDownLatch waitForBlockDetectionResult = new CountDownLatch(1);