Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
drm/xe/guc: Fix uninitialised count in GuC load debug prints
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The debug prints about how long the GuC load takes have a loop
counter. However that was neither initialised nor incremented! Plus,
counting loops is no longer meaningful given the wait function returns
early for any change in the status value. So fix it to only count
loops due to actual timeouts.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405250151.IbH0l8FG-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: b0ac1b4 ("drm/xe/guc: Port over the slow GuC loading support from i915")
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240524202603.4011656-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
  • Loading branch information
johnharr-intel committed May 28, 2024
1 parent 8de6625 commit fa171d4
Showing 1 changed file with 9 additions and 7 deletions.
16 changes: 9 additions & 7 deletions drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
ktime_t before, after, delta;
int load_done;
u32 status = 0;
int count;
int count = 0;
u64 delta_ms;
u32 before_freq;

Expand All @@ -604,6 +604,7 @@ static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
*/
do {
u32 last_status = status & (GS_UKERNEL_MASK | GS_BOOTROM_MASK);
int ret;

/*
* Wait for any change (intermediate or terminal) in the status register.
Expand All @@ -612,9 +613,10 @@ static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
* timeouts rather than allowing a huge timeout each time. So basically, need
* to treat a timeout no different to a value change.
*/
xe_mmio_wait32_not(gt, GUC_STATUS, GS_UKERNEL_MASK | GS_BOOTROM_MASK,
last_status, 1000 * 1000, &status, false);

ret = xe_mmio_wait32_not(gt, GUC_STATUS, GS_UKERNEL_MASK | GS_BOOTROM_MASK,
last_status, 1000 * 1000, &status, false);
if (ret < 0)
count++;
after = ktime_get();
delta = ktime_sub(after, before);
delta_ms = ktime_to_ms(delta);
Expand All @@ -626,7 +628,7 @@ static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)
if (delta_ms >= (GUC_LOAD_RETRY_LIMIT * 1000))
break;

xe_gt_dbg(gt, "load still in progress, count = %d, freq = %dMHz (req %dMHz), status = 0x%08X [0x%02X/%02X]\n",
xe_gt_dbg(gt, "load still in progress, timeouts = %d, freq = %dMHz (req %dMHz), status = 0x%08X [0x%02X/%02X]\n",
count, xe_guc_pc_get_act_freq(guc_pc),
guc_pc_get_cur_freq(guc_pc), status,
REG_FIELD_GET(GS_BOOTROM_MASK, status),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -678,13 +680,13 @@ static void guc_wait_ucode(struct xe_guc *guc)

xe_device_declare_wedged(gt_to_xe(gt));
} else if (delta_ms > GUC_LOAD_TIME_WARN_MS) {
xe_gt_warn(gt, "excessive init time: %lldms! [status = 0x%08X, count = %d]\n",
xe_gt_warn(gt, "excessive init time: %lldms! [status = 0x%08X, timeouts = %d]\n",
delta_ms, status, count);
xe_gt_warn(gt, "excessive init time: [freq = %dMHz (req = %dMHz), before = %dMHz, perf_limit_reasons = 0x%08X]\n",
xe_guc_pc_get_act_freq(guc_pc), guc_pc_get_cur_freq(guc_pc),
before_freq, xe_gt_throttle_get_limit_reasons(gt));
} else {
xe_gt_dbg(gt, "init took %lldms, freq = %dMHz (req = %dMHz), before = %dMHz, status = 0x%08X, count = %d\n",
xe_gt_dbg(gt, "init took %lldms, freq = %dMHz (req = %dMHz), before = %dMHz, status = 0x%08X, timeouts = %d\n",
delta_ms, xe_guc_pc_get_act_freq(guc_pc), guc_pc_get_cur_freq(guc_pc),
before_freq, status, count);
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit fa171d4

Please sign in to comment.