Groovy Parser supports basic Enum classes #5781
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
jevanlingen
force-pushed
the
parse-groovy-enums
branch
from
428c3ee to
1717270
Compare
jevanlingen
changed the title
3 tasks
greg-at-moderne
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2025
rewrite-groovy/src/main/java/org/openrewrite/groovy/GroovyParserVisitor.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's changed?
Basic enumeration can be parsed as well.
What's your motivation?
No support for constructor parameters yet
There is no ConstructorCallExpression available at the enum fields, even if you use a constructor. To make the review of this PR easier, I created a follow up PR: