Skip to content

Conversation

amishra-u
Copy link
Contributor

@amishra-u amishra-u commented Oct 28, 2024

What's changed?

Added migration templates for few more joda-time methods, including methods from the following classes:

  1. AbstractDateTime
  2. AbstractDuration
  3. AbstractInstant
  4. BaseDateTime
  5. DateTimeFormatter
  6. Instant

Additionally, introduced support for migrating methods implemented by two different classes that do not share the same class hierarchy.

Note: I had to increase heap size for test task. The tests were failing with OutOfMemory error.

Checklist

  • I've added unit tests to cover both positive and negative cases
  • I've read and applied the recipe conventions and best practices
  • I've used the IntelliJ IDEA auto-formatter on affected files

Comment on lines +554 to +567
import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.time.ZoneOffset;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter;
class A {
public void foo() {
ZonedDateTime.parse("2024-10-25T15:45:00", DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
ZonedDateTime.parse("2024-10-25T15:45:00", DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss")).toInstant().toEpochMilli();
ZonedDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(1234567890L), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
ZonedDateTime.now().format(DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").withZone(ZoneOffset.UTC);
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").withZone(ZoneOffset.UTC);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.time.ZoneOffset;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter;
class A {
public void foo() {
ZonedDateTime.parse("2024-10-25T15:45:00", DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
ZonedDateTime.parse("2024-10-25T15:45:00", DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss")).toInstant().toEpochMilli();
ZonedDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(1234567890L), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
ZonedDateTime.now().format(DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").withZone(ZoneOffset.UTC);
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").withZone(ZoneOffset.UTC);
import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.time.ZoneOffset;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter;
class A {
public void foo() {
ZonedDateTime.parse("2024-10-25T15:45:00", DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
ZonedDateTime.parse("2024-10-25T15:45:00", DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss")).toInstant().toEpochMilli();
ZonedDateTime.ofInstant(Instant.ofEpochMilli(1234567890L), ZoneId.systemDefault()).format(DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
ZonedDateTime.now().format(DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"));
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").withZone(ZoneOffset.UTC);
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").withZone(ZoneOffset.UTC);
}

@timtebeek timtebeek added the recipe Recipe requested label Oct 28, 2024
}

tasks.test {
maxHeapSize = "2g" // Set max heap size to 2GB or adjust as necessary
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah we should probably set a higher memory limit than the default 512MB there. I am a bit surprised that this project needs more than that, though. The unit tests shouldn't be particularly demanding on memory, but maybe something has increased our consumption from the last time I looked

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe applyTemplate operation is very heavy on memory. And this JodaTime has too many apply template calls. Everytime it OOMed on applyTemplate call.

@sambsnyd sambsnyd merged commit 41a76c8 into openrewrite:main Oct 29, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

recipe Recipe requested

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants