Skip to content

Conversation

@turip
Copy link
Member

@turip turip commented May 29, 2025

Overview

This patch makes sure that for gathering invoices we are not returning the split line's children as that would cause a cross invoice operation that is not supported by the system (as both invoices would need to be recalculated).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Prevented editing of child lines for split invoice lines during single invoice updates to ensure data consistency.

@turip turip requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2025 20:11
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 29, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update modifies the invoice update logic to clear the Children field of split invoice lines when an invoice is being edited in the InvoiceStatusGathering state. This ensures that child line information is removed from split lines before further processing during invoice updates.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
openmeter/billing/service/invoice.go Clears the Children field of split invoice lines during invoice updates in the gathering state.

Possibly related PRs

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

Error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2
Failed executing command with error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da79f7e and 20239e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • openmeter/billing/service/invoice.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • openmeter/billing/service/invoice.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
  • GitHub Check: Artifacts / Container image
  • GitHub Check: E2E
  • GitHub Check: Artifacts / Benthos Collector Container image
  • GitHub Check: CI
  • GitHub Check: Quickstart
  • GitHub Check: Developer environment
  • GitHub Check: Commit hooks
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: Build
  • GitHub Check: Migration Checks
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@turip turip added release-note/bug-fix Release note: Bug Fixes area/billing labels May 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
openmeter/billing/service/invoice.go (1)

904-917: Good fix for preventing cross-invoice operations, but consider avoiding direct object mutation.

The implementation correctly addresses the PR objective by clearing children from split lines to prevent unsupported cross-invoice operations. The logic is sound and well-documented.

However, directly mutating the line object (line.Children = billing.LineChildren{}) could cause issues if the line is referenced elsewhere. Consider creating a copy of the line before modification.

Apply this diff to avoid direct mutation:

-invoice.Lines = billing.NewLineChildren(lo.Map(invoice.Lines.OrEmpty(), func(line *billing.Line, _ int) *billing.Line {
-	if line.Status != billing.InvoiceLineStatusSplit {
-		return line
-	}
-
-	// This makes the line children not present in the invoice
-	line.Children = billing.LineChildren{}
-
-	return line
-}))
+invoice.Lines = billing.NewLineChildren(lo.Map(invoice.Lines.OrEmpty(), func(line *billing.Line, _ int) *billing.Line {
+	if line.Status != billing.InvoiceLineStatusSplit {
+		return line
+	}
+
+	// Create a copy to avoid mutating the original line
+	lineCopy := *line
+	// This makes the line children not present in the invoice
+	lineCopy.Children = billing.LineChildren{}
+
+	return &lineCopy
+}))
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 674685c and da79f7e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • openmeter/billing/service/invoice.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
  • GitHub Check: Commit hooks
  • GitHub Check: Quickstart
  • GitHub Check: CI
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: E2E
  • GitHub Check: Developer environment
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: Migration Checks
  • GitHub Check: Build
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)

This patch makes sure that for gathering invoices we are not returning
the split line's children as that would cause a cross invoice operation
that is not supported by the system (as both invoices would need to be
recalculated).
@turip turip force-pushed the fix/updating-gathering-invoices-with-split-lines branch from da79f7e to 20239e7 Compare May 29, 2025 20:15
@turip turip enabled auto-merge (squash) May 29, 2025 20:16
@turip turip requested review from hekike and tothandras May 29, 2025 20:21
@turip turip merged commit fec10ed into main May 29, 2025
36 of 37 checks passed
@turip turip deleted the fix/updating-gathering-invoices-with-split-lines branch May 29, 2025 20:38
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants