Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run depletion with all isotopes from depleted material #2570

Closed
Justine-Luminet opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Run depletion with all isotopes from depleted material #2570

Justine-Luminet opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Justine-Luminet
Copy link

Hello,

Would it be possible to add a feature that enables to specify initial nuclides in a material that have no cross sections (for instance to run a depletion with an already depleted fuel with all the nuclides created) ?

Justine

@Justine-Luminet Justine-Luminet changed the title Run depletion with all isotopes from depleted Run depletion with all isotopes from depleted material Jun 21, 2023
@paulromano
Copy link
Contributor

If you want to run a new depletion calculation with the material compositions that were already determined from a previous OpenMC depletion calculation, this can be done with the prev_results argument on openmc.deplete.CoupledOperator:

prev_results = openmc.deplete.Results('depletion_results.h5')
op = openmc.deplete.CoupledOperator(..., prev_results=prev_results)

Would that satisfy your use case or do you need something a little more general (i.e., not relying on a previous OpenMC depletion simulation)?

@Justine-Luminet
Copy link
Author

Hello !
Thanks for the answer, but I don't necessarily want to use all of the depleted materials for a new depletion (if I want fresh fuel for instance) so prev_results wouldn't work in that case I think ?

@paulromano
Copy link
Contributor

@Justine-Luminet This should now be possible thanks to pull request #2616.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants