incorporating facts on the use of COBOL on today's era from OMP CWG's survey

[ashiskumarnaik]

incorporating facts on the use of COBOL on today's era from OMP CWG's survey

Proposed changes

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request.

Fixes # (##263)

Type of change

What type of changes does your PR introduce to the COBOL Programming Course? Put an x in the boxes that apply.

• Bug fix (change which fixes one or more issues)
• New feature (change which adds functionality or features to the course)
• Translations (change which adds or modifies translations of the course)
• Documentation (change which modifies documentation related to the course)
• This change requires an update to the course's z/OS environment

Checklist:

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This checklist will be used as reference for both the contributor and the reviewer

• I have read the Contributing Guideline
• I have included a title and description for this PR
• I have DCO-signed all of my commits that are included in this PR
• I have tested it manually and there are no regressions found
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas (if appropriate)
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if appropriate)

[tanto259]

Hi Ashis, thanks for your PR! Left some comments to fix some grammar stuff and also make it clear what OMP CWG is.

[ashiskumarnaik]

@tanto259 I have made the necessary changes . Please review it.

[tanto259]

Other than removing "OMP CWG" for possible confusion (especially since the COBOL Working Group was never shorten as CWG in publications), I have no other feedback. Thanks, Ashis!

[tanto259]

Looks good to me, thanks, Ashis!