[PRE REVIEW]: SIRITVIS: Social Interaction Research Insights Topic Visualisation

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @CodeEagle22 (Sagar Narwade)
Repository: https://github.com/CodeEagle22/SIRITVIS/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.1.3
Editor: @oliviaguest
Reviewers: @n3mo, @cjbarrie
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @CodeEagle22. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@CodeEagle22 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (260.5 files/s, 56887.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           9            396            345           1445
XML                              1              0              0            450
Markdown                         2             83              0            179
TeX                              1             26              4            103
YAML                             1              8              0             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14            513            349           2195
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1165

[editorialbot]

Failed to discover a valid open source license

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.02507 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.143 is OK
- 10.3389/frai.2020.00042 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-demos.31 may be a valid DOI for title: OCTIS: Comparing and Optimizing Topic Models is Simple!
- 10.1145/2484028.2484166 may be a valid DOI for title: Improving lda topic models for microblogs via tweet pooling and automatic labeling
- 10.4000/books.aaccademia.10863 may be a valid DOI for title: OCTIS 2.0: Optimizing and Comparing Topic Models in Italian Is Even Simpler!
- 10.3115/v1/w14-3110 may be a valid DOI for title: LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics
- 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 may be a valid DOI for title: VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TTLocVis: A Twitter Topic Location Visualization Package
Submitting author: @xillig
Handling editor: @trallard (Retired)
Reviewers: @sara-02, @linuxscout, @aozorahime
Similarity score: 0.8190

A News Verification Browser for the Detection of Clickbait, Satire, and Falsified News
Submitting author: @VictoriaRubin
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @lrasmus, @CBenghi
Similarity score: 0.8179

R-Opitools – An Opinion Analytical Tool for Big Digital Text Document (DTD)
Submitting author: @MAnalytics
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @cjbarrie, @justinchuntingho, @jaeyk
Similarity score: 0.8141

TraViA: a Traffic data Visualization and Annotation tool in Python
Submitting author: @OlgerSiebinga
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @rusu24edward, @tomalrussell
Similarity score: 0.8121

LISC: A Python Package for Scientific Literature Collection and Analysis
Submitting author: @TomDonoghue
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @timClicks, @linuxscout
Similarity score: 0.8119

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[CodeEagle22]

Failed to discover a valid open source license

MIT License got uploaded on root directory

[oliviaguest]

@CodeEagle22 can you take a look at the missing DOIs, please?

[oliviaguest]

@ajstewartlang is this up your street?

[CodeEagle22]

@CodeEagle22 can you take a look at the missing DOIs, please?

Hey @oliviaguest, thank you for your attention to this matter; it's now resolved.

[ajstewartlang]

@ajstewartlang is this up your street?

Looks like an interesting submission but I'm at capacity currently I'm afraid.

[xillig]

Dear @oliviaguest,

is there any update with regards to our submission?

Best regards,
Gillian

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @oliviaguest is now the editor

[oliviaguest]

@xillig I am sorry things are taking so long, I am wondering why we are so over-capacity at JOSS. I will address this by handling this myself. ☺️

[oliviaguest]

@cjbarrie @mkearney @n3mo @julianmcauley do any/all of you have the time/capacity to review this, please? 😊

[n3mo]

This would be my first time reviewing for the journal, but if you still need someone I would be happy to help.

[cjbarrie]

Hi All. Sorry for slowness. I'm happy to do this. One Q before I begin: not sure how I would go about testing the Twitter connection now the the API is paid?

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @n3mo to reviewers

[editorialbot]

@n3mo added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @cjbarrie to reviewers

[editorialbot]

@cjbarrie added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6243.

[julianmcauley]

unsubscribe

…

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 08:38, The Open Journals editorial robot < ***@***.***> wrote: Closed #5991 <#5991> as completed. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5991 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOYH4JDSWEEV7SRCHIM3ATYPKOR7AVCNFSM6AAAAAA6TB3Q32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJRGUZTSNZRGUZDONA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[CodeEagle22]

Hi All. Sorry for slowness. I'm happy to do this. One Q before I begin: not sure how I would go about testing the Twitter connection now the the API is paid?

Hello @cjbarrie, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. In my previous assessment, the Twitter streaming feature's API was free and operational. However, the current cost of approximately $5000 per month as you mentioned for utilizing the API with multiple filters which unaffordable for me. I am unsure about your testing approach, but unless an alternative solution is identified, I may have to consider removing the reference to this feature from the paper.