-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: DataLad: distributed system for joint management of code, data, and their relationship #3254
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #3254 with the following error:
|
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #3254 with the following error:
|
@whedon generate pdf from branch paper-joss |
|
Just to help to get the ball rolling -- potential reviewers (from the given list) which might be interested: aaronpeikert, peterakirk, williamfgc, csadorf, szorowi1 |
@kthyng : I can take this one, unless you have another plan for it. Feel free to assign me. |
Thx @arokem ! |
OK, the editor is @arokem |
👋 @csadorf : would you be willing to review this article for JOSS? |
👋 @szorowi1: would you be willing to review this article for JOSS? |
Yes, I would be happy to! the only hitch is that I will be on vacation from May 13th until May 28th. What is the expected timeline? |
@csadorf : Ideally, we'd like to finish this in a few weeks. Do you think that you will have time for a first round of review before you head out on your vacation? |
👋 @pibion : would you be willing to review this article for JOSS? |
👋 @jkanche: would you be willing to review this article for JOSS? |
@arokem Since this would be my first review for JOSS I am afraid that I might not be able to without comprising due diligence. So unfortunately I have to decline this time. Please feel free to reach out to me again in case that you would still like my input on this particular submission after my return or for similar submissions in the future. |
would be happy to help |
@whedon assign @jkanchee as reviewer |
OK, @jkanchee is now a reviewer |
OK, @szorowi1 is now a reviewer |
OK, @jkanche is now a reviewer |
@whedon commands |
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
|
@whedon remove @jkanchee as reviewer |
OK, @jkanchee is no longer a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #3262. |
Submitting author: @yarikoptic (Yaroslav Halchenko)
Repository: https://github.com/datalad/datalad
Version: 0.14.3
Editor: @arokem
Reviewers: @szorowi1, @jkanche
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @yarikoptic. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @arokem.
@yarikoptic if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: