Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation #2760

Closed
whedon opened this issue Oct 18, 2020 · 24 comments
Closed

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

Submitting author: @assignUser (Jacob Wujciak-Jens)
Repository: https://github.com/kgoldfeld/simstudy/
Version: v0.2.1
Editor: @mikldk
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @assignUser. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@assignUser if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.12 s (533.5 files/s, 99010.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               33           1123           2970           4263
Rmd                             11            570            550           1016
YAML                            10             86              3            488
Markdown                         7            121              0            357
C++                              2             36              8            101
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            63           1936           3531           6225
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '154f9557d81823d24e0f4982' was
gathered on 2020/10/18.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
James Joseph Balamut             2            10             26            4.24
Keith Goldfeld                  24           487            326           95.76

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
James Joseph Balamut          9           90.0         27.5                0.00
Keith Goldfeld              136           27.9          2.8                5.88

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

PDF failed to compile for issue #2760 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-submission

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-submission. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon check references from branch joss-submission

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss-submission

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.18637/jss.v037.i03 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.02.001 is OK
- 10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p248 is OK
- 10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y is OK
- 10.1080/00031305.1991.10475828 is OK
- 10.1111/dmcn.14552 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v069.i04 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/59uaq is OK
- 10.1002/sim.8452 is OK
- 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001063 is OK
- 10.1080/03610918.2012.718841 is OK
- 10.1101/215889 is OK
- 10.1007/s10463-020-00761-4 is OK
- 10.1186/s13063-019-3364-x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@danielskatz
Copy link

👋 @mikldk - would you be willing to edit this submission?

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon invite @mikldk as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.

@openjournals openjournals deleted a comment from whedon Oct 18, 2020
@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Oct 18, 2020

@whedon assign me as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 18, 2020

OK, the editor is @mikldk

@assignUser
Copy link

Thank you for considering our submission and the quick start of the process!

Potential reviewers from the provided list with no active reviews, R/C++ and relevant topics, sorted bottom to top:
j-andrews7
gagolews
brunaw
tbrown122387
pedro-teles-fonseca

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Oct 19, 2020

@brunaw, @gagolews: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

@gagolews
Copy link

@mikldk I'm willing to write a review.

@brunaw
Copy link

brunaw commented Oct 20, 2020

@mikldk Yes, I would be happy to

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Oct 20, 2020

@whedon add @gagolews as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned gagolews and mikldk and unassigned mikldk Oct 20, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 20, 2020

OK, @gagolews is now a reviewer

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Oct 20, 2020

@whedon add @brunaw as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 20, 2020

OK, @brunaw is now a reviewer

@mikldk
Copy link

mikldk commented Oct 20, 2020

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Oct 20, 2020

OK, I've started the review over in #2763.

@whedon whedon closed this as completed Oct 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants