-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Spruceup: fast and flexible identification, visualization, and removal of outliers from large multiple sequence alignments #1616
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1616 with the following error: Could not find bibliography file: master.bib |
@marekborowiec — I am the Associate Editor-in-Chief on rotation this week, and will be working to identify an editor to handle your submission. But first, you need to add a |
Ah yes. Done. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1616 with the following error: Could not find bibliography file: master.bib |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1616 with the following error: Could not find bibliography file: master.bib |
Please merge this fix |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
Seems like I didn't set the figure caption correctly. Please try again. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
👋 @csoneson — the submitting author suggested you as handling editor. Could you take this one? Spruceup: fast and flexible identification, visualization, and removal of outliers from large multiple sequence alignments |
OK, the editor is @csoneson |
@whedon check references |
|
|
Ok, not exactly sure what just happened with the reference check, that looks a bit excessive... Anyway - @marekborowiec, do you have suggestions for reviewers that would be suitable for your submission (e.g. from the list linked in the first post in this issue)? While we are looking for reviewers, could you also fix a couple of small things in the paper:
|
|
👋 @iimog, @gavinmdouglas, @shaunpwilkinson, @giraola, @dsurujon, @Nazeeefa, @camillescott - would (two of) you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? |
👋 @camillescott I'd be willing to review this submission. |
Thanks @iimog! |
OK, the reviewer is @iimog |
Is there a way to make the figure go before References? |
Hm, making figures appear in the desired place in the output is certainly not always easy. From jgm/pandoc#845 I think you can override the default placement of the figure, and it is also possible to explicitly add |
I would suggested waiting on fixing this issue until the submission is reviewed and accepted. Layouts are notoriously hard with Markdown/Pandoc and as the paper contents may change during review, we should just fix this once at the end. Does that sounds reasonable to everyone? |
@whedon start review |
I'm sorry @iimog, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do. |
Hi @iimog - we're just waiting for one more reviewer, then I'll officially start the review; i.e., open the actual review issue, with the reviewer checklists etc. (of course, you can already start looking at the submission :)) |
Thanks @csoneson and sorry for being impatient :) |
Sounds good to me. I was just wondering if my markdown file was properly formatted. |
I'm familiar and interested in the topic although not an expert regarding alignment trimming - if that's ok then I'm happy to be a reviewer. |
Thank you @gavinmdouglas! |
@whedon add @gavinmdouglas as reviewer |
OK, @gavinmdouglas is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1635. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Submitting author: @marekborowiec (Marek Borowiec)
Repository: https://github.com/marekborowiec/spruceup
Version: v2019.1.1
Editor: @csoneson
Reviewers: @iimog, @gavinmdouglas
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @marekborowiec. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@marekborowiec if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: