-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: gtk-fortran: a GTK+ binding to build Graphical User Interfaces in Fortran #1014
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉 For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1014 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-7ea7c17cf2a1/lib/whedon/orcid_validator.rb:12:in |
👋 @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor. |
@vmagnin - this pull request should fix the paper compilation: vmagnin/gtk-fortran#124 |
@arfon - I have merged your pull request. Effectively, one of the author has no ORCID. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@daviddoria is this submission of interest to you and would you be able to help review it? |
@molines @bjonkman @szaghi @alexlarsson @komatits would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)? The review process focuses on the software and a short paper. |
No to both, sorry :)
David
…On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:40 AM Kevin Mattheus Moerman < ***@***.***> wrote:
@daviddoria <https://github.com/daviddoria> is this submission of
interest to you and would you be able to help review it?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1014 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANID1AmBcXO-E3cGvwSq522sYQfYf9Fks5ukGOAgaJpZM4XXYU8>
.
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman |
@whedon commands |
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
|
Yes do implement the changes in your own repo. You can call @arfon can you help answer the question about citing a software package when the author is a community, what should be changed in this: @misc{plplot,
author = {The Plplot developer community},
title = {PLplot - The ultimate in cross-platform plotting},
howpublished = {\url{http://plplot.sourceforge.net/}}
} to avoid it being rendered as: |
Sorry, I don't have any time to review this. |
@whedon generate pdf
|
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Browsing a lot of JOSS papers, I found one citing the R software using:
The result is: In fact, two curly brackets like in author = {{R Core Team}} prevent the compiler to search for first name and last name in the string. |
@whedon generate pdf
|
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1014 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
@johnsamuelwrites (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-7007) thanks for joining as a reviewer! This is a pre-review issue where we gather reviewers. The review process will be initiated later and takes place on a dedicated review issue. In the meantime you can familiarize yourself with the review guidelines. Let me know if you have questions. |
Thank you @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman for the invitation. I will finish the review in the upcoming days. |
Dear @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman , |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Update (7th February 2019): it is corrected. |
@vmagnin your paper currently reads:
It would be good if you could expand on this a bit more. JOSS has, in some cases, rejected GUI library submissions in the past if they did not present with a clear research application. We often try to understand if the work is of such importance to some scientific research that authors would feel inclined to cite it in subsequent papers. If they would not feel so inclined the software is likely seen and used as a simple tool, and not important enough to the actual scientific research. If you study our submission requirements you'll see it says:
Can you please expand your paper to really spell out exactly how this work is relevant to scientific research? How would the work feature in scientific research? How does the work influence the science? Does the work enable new scientific research or make it easier? Give (and perhaps cite) some specific examples of how this work is relevant in particular research applications. Creating a section that answers the above questions will help sketch a picture for readers, allowing them to understand how this work might be important enough to some scientific research that researchers will feel the need to cite it in their paper. |
@vmagnin can you reply to my comment above please. Thanks. |
Dear @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
P.S. I hope the "@" mentions will work in this message, because today the github editor does not seem to recognize them... |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Hi, I have started the review and managed to install the software with minor problems. |
OK, @devonrex is now a reviewer |
@whedon add @sundmanbo as reviewer |
OK, @sundmanbo is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1109. Feel free to close this issue now! |
@vmagnin thanks for providing the additional clarifications in your paper. I will suggest further edits to the paper (saw some language/spelling issues) but have started the review process. |
Submitting author: @vmagnin (Vincent MAGNIN)
Repository: https://github.com/jerryd/gtk-fortran
Version: v17.10
Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Reviewers: @johnsamuelwrites, @devonrex, @sundmanbo
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vmagnin. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@vmagnin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: