[PRE REVIEW]: A course on the implicit finite volume method for CFD using Python

[whedon]

Submitting author: @ctdegroot (Christopher DeGroot)
Repository: https://bitbucket.org/cdegroot/cfdcourse
Version: v1.0
Editor: @IanHawke
Reviewers: @sconde, @zingale

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @ctdegroot. The JOSE editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@ctdegroot if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #66 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[whedon]

Failed to discover a valid open source license.

[labarba]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #66 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[labarba]

@arfon Why is whedon unable to find the paper file? It is there in the repo ... is it a Bitbucket thing?

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #66 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #66 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[arfon]

Looks like the file is named Paper.md rather than paper.md. Whedon is case sensitive I'm afraid.

[labarba]

Thanks, Arfon!

👋 @ctdegroot — Could you please rename the file of your paper to paper.md?

[labarba]

You'll also need to rename the .bib file.

[ctdegroot]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[ctdegroot]

@labarba Got that naming issue sorted. The PDF looks good.

For reviewers, I could suggest @kyleniemeyer, @sconde, or @TJFord to start. Also noticed that it flagged a lack of license file; I'll get that fixed up before the review begins.

[labarba]

👋 @IanHawke — could you handle this new JOSE submission as editor?

[labarba]

@whedon assign @IanHawke as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @IanHawke

[labarba]

Thanks for agreeing to edit this for JOSE, @IanHawke !
Since this is your first one, a few notes:

• We'll want to identify two reviewers… we have a list of people who have signed up to review, but you're free to look outside that.
• For the first reviewer, use the command @whedon assign <user> as reviewer and for the second, run @whedon add <user> as reviewer (if you use assign the second time around, it will remove the original assignment).
• Once both are assigned, run @whedon start review and close this issue. A Review issue will be automatically created, with a review checklist for each reviewer.

[IanHawke]

Right, thanks for starting me off with what looks like a great course!

In addition to the license file, I'd suggest a requirements.txt or similar to get the environment set up: not essential.

[IanHawke]

@zingale: Mike, are you able to and interested in taking on this review for JOSE (the Journal of Open Source Education) ? This submission is about implicit methods for CFD and uses Python and Jupyter: I think you would be an excellent reviewer. Please see the JOSE reviewer guidelines for details about the JOSE review process.

Title: A course on the implicit finite volume method for CFD using Python
Summary: .A course on Computational Fluid Dynamics using Jupyter Notebooks and Python
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/jose-papers/blob/jose.00066/jose.00066/10.21105.jose.00066.pdf
Submitting author: @ctdegroot (Chris DeGroot)
Repository: https://bitbucket.org/cdegroot/cfdcourse

[IanHawke]

@sconde: Sidafa Conde, are you able to and interested in taking on this review for JOSE (the Journal of Open Source Education) ? This submission is about implicit methods for CFD and uses Python and Jupyter: this overlaps some of the expertise JOSE has listed for you, and I think you would be an excellent reviewer. Please see the JOSE reviewer guidelines for details about the JOSE review process.

Title: A course on the implicit finite volume method for CFD using Python
Summary: .A course on Computational Fluid Dynamics using Jupyter Notebooks and Python
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/jose-papers/blob/jose.00066/jose.00066/10.21105.jose.00066.pdf
Submitting author: @ctdegroot (Chris DeGroot)
Repository: https://bitbucket.org/cdegroot/cfdcourse

[sconde]

Sidafa Conde, are you able to and interested in taking on this review for JOSE (the Journal of Open Source Education)

@IanHawke I accept

[IanHawke]

Thank you @sconde ! The review will take place in another issue thread that will launch as soon as we have a second reviewer, but if you want to start the review already then feel free to link any issues that you create to this thread for now.

@whedon assign @sconde as reviewer

[labarba]

@whedon assign @sconde as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @sconde

[labarba]

👋 @IanHawke — @whedon likes its commands to come alone in a comment :–)

[zingale]

I can do a review too. I'll be a little slow this week, but can finish the following.

[IanHawke]

@zingale : Thanks! Very happy that you can contribute to this.

[IanHawke]

@whedon add @zingale as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @zingale is now a reviewer

[IanHawke]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #67. Feel free to close this issue now!

[IanHawke]

@sconde , @zingale : the review issue is now started at #67 . There is a detailed checklist there. Thanks for your help with this review!