Skip to content

Conversation

@JesperIRL
Copy link
Member

@JesperIRL JesperIRL commented Feb 11, 2026


Progress

  • JDK-8377509 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8377509: Add licenses for gcc 14.2.0 (Bug - P1 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk26u.git pull/50/head:pull/50
$ git checkout pull/50

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/50
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk26u.git pull/50/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 50

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 50

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk26u/pull/50.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 11, 2026

👋 Welcome back jwilhelm! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2026

@JesperIRL This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8377509: Add licenses for gcc 14.2.0

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 113f561: 8375598: VM crashes with "assert((labs(val) & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000) == 0 || dest == (address)-1) failed: must be 32bit offset or -1" when using too high value for NonNMethodCodeHeapSize

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 961d32842d7841701a33659493a84b4d2c4d2f82 8377509: Add licenses for gcc 14.2.0 Feb 11, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2026

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Feb 11, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2026

⚠️ @JesperIRL This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 11, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Feb 12, 2026
@JesperIRL
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Going to push as commit 2aeb22764f46555f5fcc78186ee01dad711f7e6f.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 113f561: 8375598: VM crashes with "assert((labs(val) & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000) == 0 || dest == (address)-1) failed: must be 32bit offset or -1" when using too high value for NonNMethodCodeHeapSize

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 12, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 12, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 12, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2026

@JesperIRL Pushed as commit 2aeb227.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant