Skip to content

Conversation

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 commented Dec 2, 2025

Backporting JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs

For parity with Oracle JDK. Fix adjusts iteration count by dividing by CPU core count, and removed timeout=800 as default 120 timeout is now sufficient.

Merge conflict (resolved) was the change in the timeout.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64. Also ran a test on an EC2 instance (linux-x64) with high cpu count (r5dn.24xlarge - 96 core) and it finished under 1s:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java

Results are attached.

linux-x64-96-core-test.log

linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log
linux-aarch64-specific-test.log
linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log
linux-x64-specific-test.log
macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log
macos-aarch64-specific-test.log
windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log
windows-x64-specific-test.log


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8354894 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/49/head:pull/49
$ git checkout pull/49

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/49
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/49/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 49

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 49

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/49.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back rm-gh-8! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@rm-gh-8 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 48 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 0366d8823bc844225ca24964e352ce0a57d01683 8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs Dec 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base label Dec 2, 2025
@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2025 16:25
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAICS, the timeout=800 -> timeout=200 change was part of JDK-8260555: Change the default TIMEOUT_FACTOR from 4 to 1, which was reverted by JDK-8369491, but mainline just never needed to update the test back, because this fix landed.

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Dec 3, 2025

AFAICS, the timeout=800 -> timeout=200 change was part of JDK-8260555: Change the default TIMEOUT_FACTOR from 4 to 1, which was reverted by JDK-8369491, but mainline just never needed to update the test back, because this fix landed.

The original commit indicates that the default 120 timeout is sufficient, so the explicit timeout can be removed. This was also tested in a 96 core EC2 instance.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 3, 2025

⚠️ @rm-gh-8 This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 3, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Webrevs

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Dec 3, 2025

/approval request for backport of JDK-8354894: java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timeout on server with high CPUs.

For parity with Oracle JDK.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 3, 2025

@rm-gh-8
8354894: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Dec 3, 2025
@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Dec 5, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@rm-gh-8
Your change (at version 84e75d1) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Going to push as commit b7b842e.
Since your change was applied there have been 49 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@phohensee @rm-gh-8 Pushed as commit b7b842e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants