8378377: Remove use of AppContext from JEditorPane

[prrace]

Remove AppContext from JEditorPane

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8378377: Remove use of AppContext from JEditorPane (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Damon Nguyen (@DamonGuy - Reviewer) Review applies to c0cb0a30
• Prasanta Sadhukhan (@prsadhuk - Reviewer) Review applies to c0cb0a30
• Sergey Bylokhov (@mrserb - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29855/head:pull/29855
$ git checkout pull/29855

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/29855
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29855/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 29855

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 29855

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29855.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8378377: Remove use of AppContext from JEditorPane

Reviewed-by: serb, dnguyen, psadhukhan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 78 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• d6044d3: 8378194: Protect process_pending_interp_only() work with JvmtiThreadState_lock
• abec212: 8377011: Shenandoah: assert_bounds should be only called when boundaries have changed
• 32cc7f1: 8377947: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java failed on linux-x64
• ... and 75 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3bd4a111802f82afec1af1a732be2eab150255c5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@prrace The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 03: Full - Incremental (942505ad)
• 02: Full - Incremental (a29d2c66)
• 01: Full - Incremental (c0cb0a30)
• 00: Full (60e13535)

[prrace]

@prsadhuk @DamonGuy please review

[DamonGuy]

Looks fine to me now. There may be merit to removing getKitRegistry method but it's used a couple times throughout and would require additional changes as well.

[prsadhuk]

LGTM

[prrace]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 71a1af7.
Since your change was applied there have been 94 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 94de898: 8372382: Invalid RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations for compact record constructor
• 4f83d21: 8368864: Confusing error message (or wrong error) when record component has @deprecated Javadoc tag
• 3b8abd4: 8378398: Modernize test/jdk/java/net/URLClassLoader/HttpTest.java
• ... and 91 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3bd4a111802f82afec1af1a732be2eab150255c5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@prrace Pushed as commit 71a1af7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.