Skip to content

Conversation

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls commented Jun 17, 2025

The classes javax.management.AttributeList, and javax.management.relation.RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList, have a historical feature where they accept objects of the wrong type, and only check for wrong objects when the "asList()" method is called.

This feature should be removed, and these classes should never accept the wrong kind of Object.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8359917 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object (Enhancement - P4)
  • JDK-8359917: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25856/head:pull/25856
$ git checkout pull/25856

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25856
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25856/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25856

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25856

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25856.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2025

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 143 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 17, 2025

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • jmx
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org jmx jmx-dev@openjdk.org labels Jun 17, 2025
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/csr

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jun 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 18, 2025

@kevinjwalls has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.

@kevinjwalls please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8359809 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

// Revisit [cebro] Localize message
String excMsg = "Invalid parameter.";
throw new IllegalArgumentException(excMsg);
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid parameter");
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing the trailing dot from "parameter.", here and new line 247 below, to be in line with the rest.

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2025 11:35
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 18, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Webrevs

@sspitsyn
Copy link
Contributor

Joe asked a question in related CSR. I'm also interested to know the answer. :)

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will update the CSR to clarify/answer the questions.

I've updated the PR to remove a few checkTypeSafe() calls: they are generally wanted when we add an Object or Collection, but not needed in e.g. an add(Role) method that specifically takes the type that we want. This is why there are api doc additions for the overridden methods that take Object or Collection, and not for the non-overridden add methods that take a specific type (they don't check the type and throw).

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jul 8, 2025
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

CSR is approved, will need to get re-review or additional review 8-)

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good to me now.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 10, 2025
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Going to push as commit cbc7090.
Since your change was applied there have been 143 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2025

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit cbc7090.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated jmx jmx-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants