Skip to content

Conversation

@liach
Copy link
Member

@liach liach commented Apr 17, 2025

The downcallHandle method in Linker has a complex implementation, and type switches is triggered in multiple places in that handle.

After bytestacks analysis of a simple program that links the native implementation of Class::forName0, it turns out that:

  1. there are a few missed usages of type switch in ClassFile API
  2. type switch can speed up generation by using explicit stack maps, as stack map gen is over 50% of the generation instructions because the switch is branch-heavy, but the frames are actually simple.

These two combined are not that significant in the overall overhead of downcallHandle, but would be helpful for other workloads.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8354899: Reduce overhead associated with type switches (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24705/head:pull/24705
$ git checkout pull/24705

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24705
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24705/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24705

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24705

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24705.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@liach This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8354899: Reduce overhead associated with type switches

Reviewed-by: asotona

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 25 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@liach The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 17, 2025
@liach liach marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2025 19:45
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 17, 2025
if (parent instanceof BlockCodeBuilderImpl bcb) {
return bcb.topLocal;
}
return findTerminal(parent).curTopLocal();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This advanced switch prevents CodeBuilder::ifThen or ifThenElse from being used in early bootstrap.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Webrevs

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Apr 17, 2025

Testing: tier 1-3

@asotona
Copy link
Member

asotona commented Apr 22, 2025

Both parts of this PR look good to me, however they seem to be unrelated.
I would suggest to create another PR for #1, as the Class-File API JDK boot safety is not related to the SUBJ.

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Apr 22, 2025

Done, reran jdk/jdk/classfile langtools/tools/javac/patterns jdk/java/lang/runtime tests.

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Apr 22, 2025

Split the ClassFile API boot safety into #24807.

Copy link
Member

@asotona asotona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that the performance of the Class-File API can be improved in critical use cases like this, even though we don't 100% eat our own dog food.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 23, 2025
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Apr 23, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Going to push as commit bd1c53e.
Since your change was applied there have been 47 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

@liach Pushed as commit bd1c53e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants