Skip to content

8350050: Shenandoah: evaluate & potentially deprecate ShenandoahPacing #24002

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ysramakrishna
Copy link
Member

@ysramakrishna ysramakrishna commented Mar 12, 2025

/issue JDK-8350050

This is still a draft of work in progress.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8350050: Shenandoah: evaluate & potentially deprecate ShenandoahPacing (Task - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24002/head:pull/24002
$ git checkout pull/24002

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24002
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24002/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24002

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24002

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24002.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 12, 2025

👋 Welcome back ysr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 12, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title DRAFT: Shenandoah: evaluate & potentially deprecate ShenandoahPacing 8350050: Shenandoah: evaluate & potentially deprecate ShenandoahPacing Mar 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 12, 2025

@ysramakrishna The primary solved issue for a PR is set through the PR title. Since the current title does not contain an issue reference, it will now be updated.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 12, 2025

@ysramakrishna The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Mar 12, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 7, 2025

@ysramakrishna This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 8 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@ysramakrishna
Copy link
Member Author

Getting some performance numbers and will open up for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant