Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8349092: File.getFreeSpace violates specification if quotas are in effect (win) #23377

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bplb
Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb commented Jan 31, 2025

On Windows, for File.getFreeSpace return the same value as returned by File.getUsableSpace.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8349092: File.getFreeSpace violates specification if quotas are in effect (win) (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23377/head:pull/23377
$ git checkout pull/23377

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23377
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23377/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23377

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23377

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23377.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 31, 2025

👋 Welcome back bpb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 31, 2025

@bplb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8349092: File.getFreeSpace violates specification if quotas are in effect (win)

Reviewed-by: naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 95 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • eb84702: 8349513: Remove unused BUILD_JDK_JTREG_LIBRARIES_JDK_LIBS_libTracePinnedThreads
  • f12d2de: 8345212: Since checker should better handle non numeric values
  • 5ec1aae: 8347842: ThreadPoolExecutor specification discusses RuntimePermission
  • 3fbae32: 8349465: [UBSAN] test_os_reserve_between.cpp reported applying non-zero offset to null pointer
  • e0487c7: 8346777: Add missing const declarations and rename variables
  • 2b82e2d: 8347958: Minor compiler cleanups relating to MandatoryWarningHandler
  • 2093bb7: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding
  • dd8720e: 8348520: [s390x] Problemlist TestVectorReinterpret.java
  • 4618993: 8349537: Bad copyright in TestArrayStructs.java
  • acb46dd: 8345155: Add /native to native test in FFM
  • ... and 85 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d985b31cbb5646c526e1a68a7547f26f56d37607...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 31, 2025

@bplb The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 31, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 6, 2025
@bplb
Copy link
Member Author

bplb commented Feb 6, 2025

Thanks, @naotoj.

I should note that the test passed on Linux and macOS, and JCK CI tiers 1-3 passed on Windows.

@bplb
Copy link
Member Author

bplb commented Feb 6, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Going to push as commit 1a74ee6.
Since your change was applied there have been 98 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0181030: 8349006: File.getCanonicalPath should remove "(on UNIX platforms)" from its specification
  • ed8945a: 8347377: Add validation checks for ICC_Profile header fields
  • 1ab1c1d: 8349058: 'internal proprietary API' warnings make javac warnings unusable
  • eb84702: 8349513: Remove unused BUILD_JDK_JTREG_LIBRARIES_JDK_LIBS_libTracePinnedThreads
  • f12d2de: 8345212: Since checker should better handle non numeric values
  • 5ec1aae: 8347842: ThreadPoolExecutor specification discusses RuntimePermission
  • 3fbae32: 8349465: [UBSAN] test_os_reserve_between.cpp reported applying non-zero offset to null pointer
  • e0487c7: 8346777: Add missing const declarations and rename variables
  • 2b82e2d: 8347958: Minor compiler cleanups relating to MandatoryWarningHandler
  • 2093bb7: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding
  • ... and 88 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d985b31cbb5646c526e1a68a7547f26f56d37607...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 6, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

@bplb Pushed as commit 1a74ee6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@bplb bplb deleted the File-getFreeSpace-8349092 branch February 6, 2025 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants