Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8340554: Improve MessageFormat readObject checks #21570

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu commented Oct 17, 2024

Please review this PR which improves the readObject logic for j.text.MessageFormat.

No offset should be larger than the pattern length. We already ensure the offsets when consumed backwards are equal/descending. The existing first/initial check was off by 1 since it was checking against the pattern length + 1; (see L2040 and L2043).

Please see the JBS issue for further info and other test details.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8340554: Improve MessageFormat readObject checks (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21570/head:pull/21570
$ git checkout pull/21570

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21570
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21570/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21570

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21570

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21570.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 17, 2024

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2024

@justin-curtis-lu This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 17, 2024

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 17, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

// Offset equal to pattern length (variation)
new MessageFormat("X{0}"),
// Offset 1 under pattern length (variation)
new MessageFormat("X{0}X")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: "(variation)" may not be needed

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 18, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants