-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8305072: Win32ShellFolder2.compareTo is inconsistent #18126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
aivanov-jdk
wants to merge
3
commits into
openjdk:master
from
aivanov-jdk:8305072-Win32ShellFolder2.compareTo
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
158 changes: 158 additions & 0 deletions
158
test/jdk/javax/swing/JFileChooser/FileSystemView/Win32FolderSort.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Copyright (c) 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | ||
| * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. | ||
| * | ||
| * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it | ||
| * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as | ||
| * published by the Free Software Foundation. | ||
| * | ||
| * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT | ||
| * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or | ||
| * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License | ||
| * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that | ||
| * accompanied this code). | ||
| * | ||
| * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version | ||
| * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, | ||
| * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. | ||
| * | ||
| * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA | ||
| * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any | ||
| * questions. | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| import java.io.File; | ||
| import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; | ||
| import java.lang.reflect.Method; | ||
| import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
| import java.util.Arrays; | ||
| import java.util.List; | ||
|
|
||
| /* | ||
| * @test | ||
| * @bug 8305072 | ||
| * @requires (os.family == "windows") | ||
| * @modules java.desktop/sun.awt.shell | ||
| * @summary Verifies consistency of Win32ShellFolder2.compareTo | ||
| * @run main/othervm --add-opens java.desktop/sun.awt.shell=ALL-UNNAMED Win32FolderSort | ||
| */ | ||
| public class Win32FolderSort { | ||
| public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { | ||
| Class<?> folderManager = Class.forName("sun.awt.shell.Win32ShellFolderManager2"); | ||
| Class<?> folder = Class.forName("sun.awt.shell.Win32ShellFolder2"); | ||
|
|
||
| Method getDesktop = folderManager.getDeclaredMethod("getDesktop"); | ||
| getDesktop.setAccessible(true); | ||
| Method getPersonal = folderManager.getDeclaredMethod("getPersonal"); | ||
| getPersonal.setAccessible(true); | ||
|
|
||
| Method createShellFolder = folderManager.getDeclaredMethod("createShellFolder", folder, File.class); | ||
| createShellFolder.setAccessible(true); | ||
|
|
||
| Method isFileSystem = folder.getMethod("isFileSystem"); | ||
| isFileSystem.setAccessible(true); | ||
| Method isSpecial = folder.getMethod("isSpecial"); | ||
| isSpecial.setAccessible(true); | ||
| Method getChildByPath = folder.getDeclaredMethod("getChildByPath", String.class); | ||
| getChildByPath.setAccessible(true); | ||
|
|
||
| File desktop = (File) getDesktop.invoke(null); | ||
| File personal = (File) getPersonal.invoke(null); | ||
| if (!((Boolean) isSpecial.invoke(personal))) { | ||
| throw new RuntimeException("personal is not special"); | ||
| } | ||
| File fakePersonal = (File) getChildByPath.invoke(desktop, personal.getPath()); | ||
| if (fakePersonal == null) { | ||
| fakePersonal = (File) createShellFolder.invoke(null, desktop, | ||
| new File(personal.getPath())); | ||
| } | ||
| if ((Boolean) isSpecial.invoke(fakePersonal)) { | ||
| throw new RuntimeException("fakePersonal is special"); | ||
| } | ||
| File homeDir = (File) createShellFolder.invoke(null, desktop, | ||
| new File(System.getProperty("user.home"))); | ||
|
|
||
| File[] files = {fakePersonal, personal, homeDir}; | ||
| for (File f : files) { | ||
| if (!((Boolean) isFileSystem.invoke(f))) { | ||
| throw new RuntimeException(f + " is not on file system"); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| List<String> errors = new ArrayList<>(2); | ||
| for (File f1 : files) { | ||
| for (File f2 : files) { | ||
| for (File f3 : files) { | ||
| String result = verifyCompareTo(f1, f2, f3); | ||
| if (result != null) { | ||
| String error = result + "\nwhere" | ||
| + "\n a = " + formatFile(f1, isSpecial) | ||
| + "\n b = " + formatFile(f2, isSpecial) | ||
| + "\n c = " + formatFile(f3, isSpecial); | ||
| errors.add(error); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| System.out.println("Unsorted:"); | ||
| for (File f : files) { | ||
| System.out.println(formatFile(f, isSpecial)); | ||
| } | ||
| System.out.println(); | ||
|
|
||
| Arrays.sort(files); | ||
| System.out.println("Sorted:"); | ||
| for (File f : files) { | ||
| System.out.println(formatFile(f, isSpecial)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| if (!errors.isEmpty()) { | ||
| System.err.println("Implementation of Win32ShellFolder2.compareTo is inconsistent:"); | ||
| errors.forEach(System.err::println); | ||
| throw new RuntimeException("Inconsistencies found: " + errors.size() | ||
| + " - " + errors.get(0)); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Verifies consistency of {@code Comparable} implementation. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param a the first object | ||
| * @param b the second object | ||
| * @param c the third object | ||
| * @return error message if inconsistency is found, | ||
| * or {@code null } otherwise | ||
| */ | ||
| private static String verifyCompareTo(File a, File b, File c) { | ||
| // a < b & b < c => a < c | ||
| if (a.compareTo(b) < 0 && b.compareTo(c) < 0) { | ||
| if (a.compareTo(c) >= 0) { | ||
| return "a < b & b < c but a >= c"; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // a > b & b > c => a > c | ||
| if (a.compareTo(b) > 0 && b.compareTo(c) > 0) { | ||
| if (a.compareTo(c) <= 0) { | ||
| return "a > b & b > c but a <= c"; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // a = b & b = c => a = c | ||
| if (a.compareTo(b) == 0 && b.compareTo(c) == 0) { | ||
| if (a.compareTo(c) != 0) { | ||
| return "a = b & b = c but a != c"; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private static String formatFile(File f, Method isSpecial) | ||
| throws InvocationTargetException, IllegalAccessException { | ||
| return f + "(" + isSpecial.invoke(f) + ")"; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please say something on how/why this change solves it ?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is well described in a JBS comment by the submitter.
Let's consider the failing case where:
The value in parentheses is
isSpecial()flag.When
aandcare compared,special1 = trueandspecial2 = false, therefore the code flow enters thisif-block. Because theequalsmethod doesn't take into account theisSpecialflag, bothi1andi2are 0.jdk/src/java.desktop/windows/classes/sun/awt/shell/Win32ShellFolderManager2.java
Lines 534 to 535 in 7bccc84
Thus,
aandcare considered equal, which breaks the general contract ofComparable.compareTo.If you look below this
if-statement:jdk/src/java.desktop/windows/classes/sun/awt/shell/Win32ShellFolderManager2.java
Lines 545 to 550 in 7bccc84
The comment and the code say that any special folder sorts above any regular folder. Therefore the code shouldn't enter that
if-block above if only one of the folders is special — the order is already well-defined for such case.The purpose of the
if-block is to make some of the special folders even more special. In other words, it ensures the following special folders—getPersonal,getDesktop,getDrives,getNetwork—are at the top of the list, above any other special folders.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, changing the condition in the
if-block fromspecial1 || special2tospecial1 && special2makes the sorting order consistent because the relation is now transitive:Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, I'm the submitter of the original bug report. I can confirm that you got the reason for the change exactly right.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@uckelman, Your message is hidden until you accept OpenJDK Terms of Use.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @uckelman, for the detailed analysis. Greatly appreciated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@uckelman Is there a way to reproduce the original bug in the user's environment?
I think there's a bug in JDK which leads to two Documents folders in the list. If the bug is still reproducible, collecting more data will help us identify the problem and fix it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I can get in contact with the user, I expect he'd still be able to trigger the bug with my test case, yeah. I'll try to get his attention.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't heard back yet. I hope investigating the second bug will not hold up the fix for the first bug getting merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not a show-stopper. These are different bugs. If possible, I'd like to follow up and find the root cause of why there are two identical folders in the file list.