-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FluidBodySurface #16
Comments
Good that we have this - this subject area can be tricky to deal with. Water tables and piezometric surfaces do have an unnerving tendency to move up and down, which is perhaps more of a real life problem that a problem for our model. Also, piezometric surfaces in artesian conditions are interesting! It would be interesting to see example of how these are dealt with in real life models (the hydrogeologists should know best - do we have any on here?) Probably need to read OGC GroundWaterML2. Do we know who is using this? |
I think this term should be reserved for (what I refer to as) observational models. We may need to new item for such surface intended for design/analysis , i.e. analogous to the (correct) separation between geological unit and geotechnical unit. |
Well there is exactly a joint OGC - WMO workshop organised today (March 10th) on that topic. See here At least, Geological Surveys from Canada, US and in Europe use it. |
Your timing is perfect. It just started 😊
—
Allen Cadden / Principal
From: Mickaël Beaufils ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 7:27 AM
To: opengeospatial/Geotech ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [opengeospatial/Geotech] FluidBodySurface (Issue #16)
It would be interesting to see example of how these are dealt with in real life models (the hydrogeologists should know best - do we have any on here?)
Probably need to read OGC GroundWaterML2. Do we know who is using this?
Well there is exactly a joint OGC - WMO workshop organised today on that topic. See here<https://hydrohub.wmo.int/en/news-events/wmo-ogc-workshop-groundwaterml2-standard>
At least, Geological Surveys from Canada, US and in Europe use it.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#16 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJD4CPRO55HEKBG7AUU4H3U7HTAVANCNFSM5PEMVAQA>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
|
There is a good example (well commented) of a FluidBody here http://schemas.opengis.net/gwml/2.2/instances/GW_FluidBody-BoM_uc5-mapping-v2_2.xml |
Source definition : OGC GroundWaterML2 also candidate for IFC
A surface on a fluid body within a local or regional area, e.g. piezometric, potentiometric, water table, salt wedge, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: