Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add noflex scenario for eMob MIT #821

Closed
nesnoj opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #832
Closed

Add noflex scenario for eMob MIT #821

nesnoj opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #832
Assignees
@nesnoj
Labels
🏗️ integration Integrating a data processing step

Comments

@nesnoj
Copy link
Member

nesnoj commented Jun 23, 2022

Current structure with flex:

[bus_el] --> [link_charging_load] -> [bus_ev] --> [driving_load]
                                         ^
                                         |
                                         ˅
                                 [store_ev_battery]

Noflex:

[bus_el] --> [charging_load]
@nesnoj nesnoj added the 🏗️ integration Integrating a data processing step label Jun 23, 2022
@nesnoj nesnoj self-assigned this Jun 23, 2022
@nesnoj nesnoj mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2022
Closed
@nesnoj nesnoj mentioned this issue Jul 7, 2022
Merged
6 tasks
@nesnoj
Copy link
Member Author

nesnoj commented Jul 10, 2022

@ClaraBuettner
The emob MIT part ran successfully in SH mode (CI run running), and the components in the eTraGo tables look as in the first post above.

nesnoj added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2022
@nesnoj
Merge pull request #832 from openego/features/#821_emob_mit_noflex_sc…
6bcae7c 
…enario

Features/#821 emob mit noflex scenario
@nesnoj nesnoj mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nesnoj nesnoj

Labels
🏗️ integration Integrating a data processing step
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Features/#821 emob mit noflex scenario openego/eGon-data
1 participant
@nesnoj