Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: Add Node 20 to CI matrix #743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

arbrandes
Copy link
Contributor

@arbrandes arbrandes commented Mar 7, 2024

Description

As a first step in the upgrade to Node 20, add it to the CI matrix as a non-blocking test.

See the tracking issue for further information.

@arbrandes arbrandes added the maintenance Routine upkeep necessary for the health of the platform label Mar 7, 2024
@arbrandes arbrandes mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (faeb02c) to head (cdbbf55).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #743   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           2       2           
  Lines           7       7           
======================================
  Misses          7       7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@arbrandes arbrandes force-pushed the node20-upgrade-1 branch 2 times, most recently from 9f1f406 to b29402b Compare March 7, 2024 11:54
@arbrandes arbrandes changed the title ci: Add Node 20 to matrix ci: Add Node 20 to CI matrix Mar 7, 2024
As a first step in the upgrade to Node 20, add it to the CI matrix as a
non-blocking test.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Routine upkeep necessary for the health of the platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants